Britain’s “Hate Speech” Trap - MARSHALL YEATS • January 31, 2024 - • 2,600 Words
Quote:
Britain’s speech law is demonstrably Jewish in origin and design. The impetus behind the Public Order Act 1986 can be traced back to the 1910s with early murmurings among Britain’s Jewish elite about the potential criminalization of anti-Semitism. Following the Jewish bombing of the King David Hotel, then British administrative headquarters for Mandatory Palestine, in 1946, Jewish delegates attempted to pass a resolution “outlawing anti-Semitism” at that year’s annual Labour Party Conference.[1] However, the bombing cost the Zionists a great many non-Jewish friends within the Labour movement, and the proposal was crushed. Following the notorious Sergeant’s Affair, in which Jewish terrorists murdered British soldiers in barbaric fashion, another explicit proposal to outlaw anti-Semitism was introduced in the House of Commons, but was rejected at its first reading in 1948. Direct and explicit efforts such as these continued to fail. In Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policy Making Since the 1960s, Erik Bleich notes that “during the late 1950s and early 1960s Jewish groups sought laws against anti-Semitic public speeches made during this era, but there is little evidence that this pressure achieved substantial results.”
Londonrake wrote:Lordo wrote:Only paper to look at this tragedy properly.Those seeking to exploit this incident for political gain risk whipping up hatred against immigrants which could risk innocent lives.
They should remember how then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s insulting remarks about women wearing the burka in 2019 resulted in a surge of anti-Muslim attacks.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/london-chemical-attack-on-mother-and-child-shouldn-t-be-used-to-whip-up-hate/ar-BB1hGGMQ?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=05ec2db0bc884753900b6f667a9a591b&ei=14
Criticism isn't confined specifically to the chemical attack events precipitated by Abdul Ezidi per se. Although, they are bad enough. More widely, it's a question of the system which allows an asylum seeker (he arrived 2016 in the back of a lorry from Afghanistan) who had received a conviction for sexual assault and indecent exposure being allowed to stay in the UK on the word of a minor priest that he had "totally converted to Christianity". Despite a considerable amount of evidence to the contrary. The whole thing sucks and with more than a million being allowed into the UK annually there's going to be a severe backlash at some time or other. In that, it seems, over 50 years ago Enoch had a point.
Robin Hood wrote:Lordo's use of 'swine' as a description of the British has always left me confused! This explanation of the origin of Britain's speech legislation and the effect it has had in manipulating British society over the years, to the point the British Identity has all but disappeared?Britain’s “Hate Speech” Trap - MARSHALL YEATS • January 31, 2024 - • 2,600 Words
Quote:
Britain’s speech law is demonstrably Jewish in origin and design. The impetus behind the Public Order Act 1986 can be traced back to the 1910s with early murmurings among Britain’s Jewish elite about the potential criminalization of anti-Semitism. Following the Jewish bombing of the King David Hotel, then British administrative headquarters for Mandatory Palestine, in 1946, Jewish delegates attempted to pass a resolution “outlawing anti-Semitism” at that year’s annual Labour Party Conference.[1] However, the bombing cost the Zionists a great many non-Jewish friends within the Labour movement, and the proposal was crushed. Following the notorious Sergeant’s Affair, in which Jewish terrorists murdered British soldiers in barbaric fashion, another explicit proposal to outlaw anti-Semitism was introduced in the House of Commons, but was rejected at its first reading in 1948. Direct and explicit efforts such as these continued to fail. In Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policy Making Since the 1960s, Erik Bleich notes that “during the late 1950s and early 1960s Jewish groups sought laws against anti-Semitic public speeches made during this era, but there is little evidence that this pressure achieved substantial results.”
Quite a long read but sets the background as to the origin of ‘The Swine’, as Lordo describes them, that now rule the UK !
https://www.unz.com/article/britains-hate-speech-trap/
repulsewarrior wrote:...calculate per foot, then decide if it is unreasonable.
Britain braced for clash with France and Belgium as UK demands EU stop importing from Russia
Data drawn up by the Femicide Census, founded by Karen Ingala Smith and Clarrie O’Callaghan, covering the period 2009 -2018, found at least 1,419 men killed 1,425 women in the UK in the period 2009-2018. Almost half the perpetrators were known to have histories of violence against women.
Ryan Ingham, 27, killed Caroline Finegan, 29, in 2014, with “a devastating blow”. He had 23 previous convictions, many for domestic abuse.
Twenty-nine perpetrators had killed previously.
Gary Arthur Allen, 47, killed two women 21 years apart, in 1997 and 2018. Allen first strangled and inflicted 33 injuries on Samantha Class, 29, including driving his car over her.
In 2018, Alena Grlakova, 38, also suffered multiple injuries. “The pleasure of hurting builds from the planning stage,” he told a probation officer. “Prostitutes are easy targets.”
Wayne Couzens, the killer of Sarah Everard, unlocked the scale of largely unpunished misogyny and abuse within the police, not the only institution in which perpetrators operate.
In England and Wales:
Three out of four domestic abuse offences reported to the police resulted in no further action. Convictions have dropped 35% over five years and convictions for coercive control and rape are minuscule.
Approximately 400,000 perpetrators per year cause medium and high levels of harm, yet fewer than 1% received specialist intervention that might stop the carnage.
Perpetrators have a passport to offend.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests