Ok lets hear it
What happened in the 2019 elction
How did it happen?
And of course why did it happen?
Lets take what happened first?
But I must tell you I am here for a very short time. I no longer have that much time to waste.
The floor is yours?
Londonrake wrote:Lordo wrote:I opened the subject up but you decided not to participate because you are one thick politically ignorant cunt. You now have ne hell of a corrupt cunt in charge. Sleep well, you can do that easier when you are ignorant as you are.
Your comments still put you in the old git category not far from Steptoe.
You didn't "open the subject up". You jumped in and tried to make yourself look clever by taking the piss at what was clearly a joke post and actually the reverse happened.
A politically ignorant cunt is somebody who thought, the day before a General Election, that Jeremy Corbyn was headed for a 100 seat majority. When in fact, as was quite obvious to the "ignorant," he ended up with the biggest Labour disaster for almost a century.
If ignorance is measured in sensible, well put together and reasonable posts, the defence rests. You're a self opinionated, semi literate twat and should have used your years break to improve on that.
You have no idea how old I am. Much like another bully-boy - prone to drunken ranting - moron on this site. Thankfully now out of my hair.
Lordo wrote:Ok lets hear it
What happened in the 2019 elction
How did it happen?
And of course why did it happen?
Lets take what happened first?
But I must tell you I am here for a very short time. I no longer have that much time to waste.
The floor is yours?
Lordo wrote:Londonrake wrote:Lordo wrote:I opened the subject up but you decided not to participate because you are one thick politically ignorant cunt. You now have ne hell of a corrupt cunt in charge. Sleep well, you can do that easier when you are ignorant as you are.
Your comments still put you in the old git category not far from Steptoe.
You didn't "open the subject up". You jumped in and tried to make yourself look clever by taking the piss at what was clearly a joke post and actually the reverse happened.
A politically ignorant cunt is somebody who thought, the day before a General Election, that Jeremy Corbyn was headed for a 100 seat majority. When in fact, as was quite obvious to the "ignorant," he ended up with the biggest Labour disaster for almost a century.
If ignorance is measured in sensible, well put together and reasonable posts, the defence rests. You're a self opinionated, semi literate twat and should have used your years break to improve on that.
You have no idea how old I am. Much like another bully-boy - prone to drunken ranting - moron on this site. Thankfully now out of my hair.
I am afraid you have to stick to the threads if you are going to make any sense so I thought i will give you a helping hand. You see I majored in two subjects in life.
1. Cultivating Gabaks/Golodges
2. Cultivating Hiyars/Angurga
this started from very early life when I was feeding them bullshit via their water supply. I have been doing that ever since except that I have switched to cultivating the human form of the said items.
It is very important to think for ones self, look at the date before opening your mouth and removing any doubts of of your stupidity level.
So <<biggest Labour disaster for almost a century.>> you say. Now is this your original thought or are you just repeating the headlines The Sun wrote about Corbyn. I realise that having seen the the girl in the picture you perhaps thought that you were actually reading The Sun and felt the need to post what you did.
But figures do not stack up. Corbyn was said to be unelectable in 2017, and yet he got 12.9 Million votes. Going back to 1974 as we do not need to go back any further to show how stupid your comment was, you will find that there is only one election where Labour got more votes than that and that was 1997 with 13.5 Million votes. Even 2019 his voted stood up to Labour levels with 10.3 Million votes.
Now have a look at election results from 2005 to 2015 with Blair Brown and Miliband standing for election and tell me they did not get less votes than either of the two Corbyn elections. How and why Labour ended up with so few seats happened can be debated but the figures speak by themselves.
By all means, if you need to understand why even that statement was made by all the media including Corbyn haters in the Labour party, we should have had a debate and you would have leant a thing or two about British Politics but I find rather than tell you about it, self learning is much more effective and is practiced in most higher educational establishment. It is harder than being taught but it is much more fulfilling for reaching enlightenment.
You stupid salivational old git, with as much of political understanding as there is in a grain of sand.
Enjoy the rest of your day now you hear?
Lordo wrote:buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuulshit.
Corbyn pulled 12.8 million votes in 2017 and and 10,3 million 2019 despite everything that went on. Brown on the other hand had 8.6 million in 2010. Blair did not fair that much better in 2005 he had 9.5 million. In fact Blair in 1997 had 13.5 Million which gave him 418 seat.
You know jack shit about politics sunshine, stick to your cab now you hear.
Lordo wrote:buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuulshit.
Corbyn pulled 12.8 million votes in 2017 and and 10,3 million 2019 despite everything that went on. Brown on the other hand had 8.6 million in 2010. Blair did not fair that much better in 2005 he had 9.5 million. In fact Blair in 1997 had 13.5 Million which gave him 418 seat.
You know jack shit about politics sunshine, stick to your cab now you hear.
Lordo wrote:I have no intention of commenting on the stupidities you post but I will challenge the facts.
You asked for why the 7 million Labour voters did not vote for Labour. Besides why some Labour voters have not for Labour which we can go into at some point, your figure of 7 million is shit. A good old outback dungie type.
Here are some figures of Labour votes of the past. I will let you conclude if there are 7 million votes missing from Labour.
1974 11,645,616
1974 11,457,079
1979 11,532,218
1983 8,456,934
1987 10,029,807
1992 11,560,484
1997 13,518,167 Blair - 418 MPs
2001 10,724,953 Blair
2005 9,552,436 - Blair - had 355 MPS
2010 8,609,527 Brown
2015 9,347,273 Miliband
2017 12,878,460 Corbyn - 262 MPs
2019 10,265,912 Corbyn - had 202 MPs
While you are at it perhaps you can explain why the different results between 2005 and 2019. Isn't democracy great? I guess that English/Charlui can join the conversation to explain the anomaly to us with his greater understanding of politics. We may throw in the results of 1997 and 2017 too. Explain, I am all ears.
Now tell me when did this 7 million people vote for Labour and did not vote now.
Like I said before you know jack shit about British politics but you do not take the trouble to look understand and post, instead you fart and remove all doubt about you understanding.
Now that reminds me where is that taxi I ordered.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest