by kythrea » Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:20 am
I just got around to reading some of the responses to my original post.
The reason that information which sheds light on historical events is important in relation to solving the Cyprus problem today is because those events (or a version of them) are used by the Turkish government to justify its ongoing occupation of Cyprus (especially the supposed threat to the Turkish-Cypriot community from the Greek-Cypriot community).
If it can be demonstrated that there were in fact other aims underpinning Turkey's invasion (eg strategic/expansionist aims on the part of Turkey and/or other countries) then one of the major arguments put forward by Turkey for maintaining a military presence in Cyprus today can be set aside.
I thought people would find the documentary I mentioned of particular interest because it is from a non-Greek source, and therefore can avoid accusations of pro-Greek bias.
oh and just for the record, I am not anti-British, anti-American, anti-Capitalist, anti-Muslim, or anti-Turkish. Any criticism I make of a particular government or policy is not and should not be taken as a slur on an entire race or nation of people, OK ? so please stop accusing me of being anti-whatever – it’s a cheap shot. I'm sure plenty of other people who have been accused of similar on this forum feel the same.