I can only handle so much Tsuki so I had to take drastic measures. Anyway, I’ve selected this rather long piece for your perusal in case you’ve got nothing better to do...
So I have been in the mental hospital for the past eighty odd days after crippling conspiracy theories launched by European women concerning the sex trade came to my attention. I have been promised therapy to deal with the aftershock of these, and in all truth do not know what to make of them, having spent much time in the hospital trying to unpick why it would be that I would be called upon to take responsibility for them, my most recent breakdown starting some weeks or months before actually entering the hospital. The question remains in my mind, what is real? One of the questions I ask myself is whether Cuba is better off in terms of managing sexual offences than Britain owing to its lack of pornography. I remember in Cuba being told of a father trying to prostitute his daughters. It is my belief that porn, most of which is virtual or illusionary anyway as far as I am aware, acts to pacify men rather than cause them to offend as Andrea Dworkin feared, but some people believe the images to be real, which then begs the question of how people end up taking part in being recorded doing such things. What is real is probabilistic and can range from outliers to mainstream consensus. To assume pornography is real is madness in my eyes. My only problem with it in the past has been its corruptive influence of denting my self-esteem. If on the other hand it is something that is real then this is something that has to be addressed and this is why I have been promised therapy.
I want to recount some further potential evidence here to counter moralistic religious teaching which really should never be raised by those who are merely speculating without experience since every possible reality can exist if called into being, in much the same way as Salmon Rushdie was censored for being an agitator.
The following link makes public the existence of technological structures which I have known about since first seeing them in my father's country of birth at the age of seven in one of the sovereign British bases there. Britain is of course a guarantor of Cyprus and continues to occupy land in a colonial manner for classified and non-classified purposes (one non-classified one being that they host the best fish and chip shop on the island by many accounts).
One has to ask what these structures are for? What information do they receive? The technology which I first saw back in the eighties has made its way down to laptops and mobile phones, but presumably the idea is that the classified structures are for dealing with security threats.
Porn is obviously, therefore, not viewed as a security threat that merits their attention or we wouldn't be able to tune into it, just as we cannot tune into signals from top level government officials.
This points to one of two scenarios, either the government is complicit in the sex trade, or porn is, as I have always believed, illusionary.
This does not mean that it does not corrupt and harm men and women, but it has always been my belief that it does so at an emotional and intellectual level, not a physical one.
Now I have been challenged on this, with people citing that the average life-expectancy of a female porn star is 36, but by life-expectancy they could mean life spent on screen. What I have not been challenged on until now is how women end up in the porn industry in the first place.
I have been told that porn is now largely female controlled in terms of profits, which is yet one more reason to suspect that what is made available freely is the most harmless porn available, with internet providers obligated to keep the more corrupting material out of searches for fear of being sued by female CEOs.
If this is the case, then I once again return to the charges of corruption against those who produce so called "interracial" porn, not on the grounds that they involve sex between differing so called "races" in absolute terms, but on the grounds that they involve sex between people without allowing those people to self-define.
To return to my basic point, if we can see it for free, then it is made at zero-marginal cost and thus completely fabricated illusions with no physical reality associated with it.
That seems to me the only obvious conclusion, it is thus not a security threat, but a form of pacification of the masses to keep them in line, and government sanctioned.
Paying for it is another matter, and that seems to me to be corruption at the highest level of society probably involving illegal transactions that are a not insignificant part of propping up the global Western economy.
This then is what the conspiracy theory being promogulated was all about, an attempt to bring down corruption at the highest level.
But, and here is the big but, who actually pays for pornography? Certainly not me.
Why should I pay for something that was produced at zero-marginal cost, out of collapsing wave-functions in the energetic fields of the atmosphere?
Indeed does anyone actually pay for porn at all? Is it really part of the Western economy or just another series of ads for the American dream?
I know there are yet more questions to be asked. But as I said, agitation in the form of words akin to the Satanic Verses should not be tolerated for profit or out of fear, which amounts to the same thing, for when we act out of fear, we act for personal gain, even if it is merely the minimization of harm to ourselves.
If the perceived harm is delusional then the act is all the more dangerous as it can cause more harm to oneself and others than inaction. This is why people are diagnosed as mentally ill.
I am not supporting any sentences of judgments made by anyone,
Here is the link:
