Cyprus-Forum.com

[DT.]

Was in Hamilton, Montana a few years ago...got shown barracks of a militia group.

DT was clearly talking about the Montana Army National Guard.

So tell us again SHIT-FOR-BRAINS, which barrack tour did DT go?

Is it the one he can NEVER go to, that you fantasize?

Or the one he SAYS he went to?

Yes he got shown a barracks of the Montana Army National Guard and he said they were better equipped than the CNG.

So let’s put 2 and 2 together here.

There was a barracks! And an army that had better equipment than the CNG.

Well shit for brains! It can only be either the US National Guard or the Montana Army National Guard.

These are the only “militias” that would have that kind of equipment.

In other words shit for brains. It isn’t some right wing nutters with a few rifles now is it!

I don’t know any red necks playing with Abrams, A10s, F-16s, Apaches, Black Hawks or C130s

Do you?

You can’t buy an Abrams army a gun shop dickface!

Btw the cng doesn’t own any abrams, a10’s, f16s, apaches, blackhawks or c130s either.

I know that. Only in your drama you would have such equipment.

If only Cyprus had A10s. The Turks would be dust.

You do know that there's a lethal weapons arms embargo from the US?

Yes I do know!

Till it got lifted by Pompeii about 4 months ago.

Biden should reinstate it before too long.

Well apparently you don't know..Pompeo only lifted the embargo on non-lethal equipment.

[Get Real!]

You said there was no difference to between the militia you visited and the CNG in terms of equipment, space, personnel...

So, you visited a militia group that was at least as well equipped as the CNG. So, given the fact the CNG has T80s what did this militia have? Abrams?

Given the fact the CNG have Hind Choppers, what did the militia have? Apaches?

Pull the other one DT. You went to the No tana National Guard. There are no private armies in the YS with that kind of equipment anywhere remotely close to the CNG.

If it’s as well equiped as the CNG then it’s a National Guard you went to of some description.

If as you claim you went to a private militia, then you went and visited an illegal terrorist or extremist group that can never be anywhere near to the equipment of the CNG. So you broke the law in that case?

You’re such a fucking idiot, you are beyond redemption!

The word “equipment” refers to military paraphernalia like helmets and these… (exartisis in Greek)

AAA.jpg

It doesn’t mean tanks, choppers, ships or missiles!

[Paphitis]

You said there was no difference to between the militia you visited and the CNG in terms of equipment, space, personnel...

So, you visited a militia group that was at least as well equipped as the CNG. So, given the fact the CNG has T80s what did this militia have? Abrams?

Given the fact the CNG have Hind Choppers, what did the militia have? Apaches?

Pull the other one DT. You went to the No tana National Guard. There are no private armies in the YS with that kind of equipment anywhere remotely close to the CNG.

If it’s as well equiped as the CNG then it’s a National Guard you went to of some description.

If as you claim you went to a private militia, then you went and visited an illegal terrorist or extremist group that can never be anywhere near to the equipment of the CNG. So you broke the law in that case?

You’re such a fucking idiot, you are beyond redemption!

The word “equipment” refers to military paraphernalia like helmets and these… (exartisis in Greek)

AAA.jpg

It doesn’t mean tanks, choppers, ships or missiles!

Don’t fucking piss me off!

Equipment is equipment and doesn’t just mean some friggin a grad camos or rifle scope FOD hunting deer. Plus they had a barracks.

You imbeciles said they went on a barracks! For gods sake, a few rednecks collecting arms or calling themselves a militia are not going to have a barracks right under the USGs nose.

[Paphitis]

Was in Hamilton, Montana a few years ago...got shown barracks of a militia group.

DT was clearly talking about the Montana Army National Guard.

So tell us again SHIT-FOR-BRAINS, which barrack tour did DT go?

Is it the one he can NEVER go to, that you fantasize?

Or the one he SAYS he went to?

Yes he got shown a barracks of the Montana Army National Guard and he said they were better equipped than the CNG.

So let’s put 2 and 2 together here.

There was a barracks! And an army that had better equipment than the CNG.

Well shit for brains! It can only be either the US National Guard or the Montana Army National Guard.

These are the only “militias” that would have that kind of equipment.

In other words shit for brains. It isn’t some right wing nutters with a few rifles now is it!

I don’t know any red necks playing with Abrams, A10s, F-16s, Apaches, Black Hawks or C130s

Do you?

You can’t buy an Abrams army a gun shop dickface!

Btw the cng doesn’t own any abrams, a10’s, f16s, apaches, blackhawks or c130s either.

I know that. Only in your drama you would have such equipment.

If only Cyprus had A10s. The Turks would be dust.

You do know that there's a lethal weapons arms embargo from the US?

Yes I do know!

Till it got lifted by Pompeii about 4 months ago.

Biden should reinstate it before too long.

Well apparently you don't know..Pompeo only lifted the embargo on non-lethal equipment.

No you are right. He lifted on non lethal arms. Won’t make a difference to you now though because Biden will unravel Trump’s legacy to support Turkey all the way.

I did know it was non lethal. It was a step in the right direction that could have led to a full lifting of the embargo. Won’t happen now.

[Kikapu]

first of all, impeachment is a political proceeding.

it is a mechanism to remove a president from office.

Given that he has already left office, it is not fit for purpose.

This isnt a criminal conviction and even if it was and for the case of the former too, there needs to be proof that he incited violence and the storming of the capitol.

No arguments for the most part.

It is irrelevant that Trump already left office. He was impeached while he was in office. If Trump and his defense team believe there are no merits for the senate to conduct a trial, then they are free not to show up, but the trial will continue with or without them since if Trump is found guilty, there are other political punishments awaits him.

It’s not even going to pass the senate. They need 20 Republicans to cross the floor. Anyone who does will have committed political suicide at the next Trump administration in 2024.

Well, it has already passed the senate to have the trial. Weather Trump is convicted or not does not really matters for the Democrats as it matters the most to the GOP if they want Trump to interfere in their Party in 2024, because either way, the Democrats going to use the outcome of the trial to their favour in the mid term elections in 2022, just like they did in Georgia and got 2 senate seats from the GOP.

[Paphitis]

Are you sure you know what day it is ?
In the all the years you have been posting you only once got anything right. Thats when you called Trump an idiot in 2016 during the US election time.
Now , General, do leave politics aside and get your debts serviced

How’s your presidential campaign going?

Did you remember to lodge the forms?

[Maximus]

Looks like the Trump impeachment motion is a sham of a trial,

It is being said that the motion is dead on arrival because the democrats cant muster the two thirds majority in the senate to go ahead.

Because, the constitution doesnt provide jurisdiction to impeach a president that has already left office.

"Democrats are wasting the nation's time on a partisan vendetta against a man no longer in office,"

This is what I was saying.

This impeachment is like trying to fire someone who has already left the job.

https://www.rt.com/usa/513714-senate-la ... ent-votes/

[Paphitis]

first of all, impeachment is a political proceeding.

it is a mechanism to remove a president from office.

Given that he has already left office, it is not fit for purpose.

This isnt a criminal conviction and even if it was and for the case of the former too, there needs to be proof that he incited violence and the storming of the capitol.

No arguments for the most part.

It is irrelevant that Trump already left office. He was impeached while he was in office. If Trump and his defense team believe there are no merits for the senate to conduct a trial, then they are free not to show up, but the trial will continue with or without them since if Trump is found guilty, there are other political punishments awaits him.

It’s not even going to pass the senate. They need 20 Republicans to cross the floor. Anyone who does will have committed political suicide at the next Trump administration in 2024.

Well, it has already passed the senate to have the trial. Weather Trump is convicted or not does not really matters for the Democrats as it matters the most to the GOP if they want Trump to interfere in their Party in 2024, because either way, the Democrats going to use the outcome of the trial to their favour in the mid term elections in 2022, just like they did in Georgia and got 2 senate seats from the GOP.

The trial will work in the GOPs favour in the midterms more likely, definitely will be in their favour in 2024 because the whole process is a tort as Trump did not incite the raid on Capitol Hill.

Regardless, the only chance to keep Donald out is for the impeachment to be carried. Abd then you may find the Democrats will be dealing with another Trump altogether in the 2024 race.

The way I see it, this impeachment favours the GOP and the Trumps. If it isn’t carried, Democrats lose. If it is carried, there will be another backlash.

Only way to get over that is to appease the masses with employment and better living standards. If however Biden is a failure, which is likely, then you better watch out.

[Maximus]

Cont. from above.

"It's almost as if they (democrats) have no ability to exist except in opposition to Donald Trump. Without him as their bogeyman, they might have to legislate and to actually convince Americans that their policy prescriptions are the right ones."

Exactly,

The democrats should do their best to unite the country and do a good job now that they have the chance,

Otherwise Trump will be back and probably beat them in the next election.

[Paphitis]

Cont. from above.

"It's almost as if they (democrats) have no ability to exist except in opposition to Donald Trump. Without him as their bogeyman, they might have to legislate and to actually convince Americans that their policy prescriptions are the right ones."

Exactly,

The democrats should do their best to unite the country and do a good job now that they have the chance,

Otherwise Trump will be back and probably beat them in the next election.

Exactly right!

All this is actually playing right into Trump’s hands. The outrage at the bogus impeachment will be pulpae. Rather than unite, they are ostracising and dividing.

Whether the impeachment happens or not, it’s a no winning situation for the Democrats. Only potential disaster down the track and a train wreck never seen before in US politics.

The whole objective of the impeachment is to illegally deny Donald the opportunity of running ever again. And even if that happens, Donald can still come out on top by having Ivanka run instead.

If the impeachment fails, which is likely, the Donald will be back in 2024. And if Biden is a disaster, the people will vote for him.