Kikapu wrote:DT. wrote:Paphitis wrote:Londonrake wrote:I suspect ending up with a black lady President by default would upset a lot of those hillbillys.
A lot of people will be upset and it won’t have anything to do about her skin colour or gender. This is 2021 and America is probably one of the most liberal countries in the world. Skin colour, gender, race, religion have no bearing. Americans will give anyone a go.
Those types of attitudes are more prevalent in Cyprus as it isn’t as liberal as US by any stretch. I doubt I will ever see a female Cypriot President in my lifetime. Now compare Cyprus with the UK who had Thatcher in the 80s. Well actually, I reckon she had balls. Bigger ones than many men!
I suspect, the reason that most people will find annoying about Camela is the fact she wasn’t elected as POTUS, and she is quite insufferable in terms of her holier than thou extreme socialist policies and that voice where she talks to the people like they are 5 years old.
Plus she has a reputation to have slept her way through most US Senators and Congressmen to get where she is today.
I'm also surprised you don't stop yourself while discussing your progressiveness when you fund yourself discussing her looks, how she slept her way to the top and her shrieking voice. These wouldn't have been in your vocabulary when discussing a male politician. Its time you evolved away from this backwater Australian culture Paphitis and recognise women for the people they are.
I don’t think Paphitis is a male chauvinist from the old school, but only a selective male chauvinism depending which political party she belongs to. It is more of a “political racism” than anything else. Most Trump supporters parrot anything Trump says, which is their downfall, hence being labeled as being “brain-dead”.
Oh I’m no chauvinist. I’d be very happy for females to gain high office and also the highest office and my political views change and swing.
I am just as happy to support Democrat if and when they actually put forward someone that befits their ideals. They, like most political party on that side of the spectrum do not represent or stand for what they say they stand for for.
I’ll give you an example.
In Australia, we had a PM that was very popular in the 80s. A man of conviction and a man of the people. He was beer swiggling and quite the earthy clown at times, and a bulldog in the political sphere. A fair person. One of our most popular. I lost faith with him during the pilot strike. Then we had Paul Keating. Another brilliant statesman but his mistake was the recession we had to have.
2 great men of Labor that stood for Labor and liberal ideals and close to the people.
Then we had Howard who is basically GOP. Another man of conviction and he too stood for the battler. He called us his little battlers. The great Aussie battlers. Tax cuts, pay rises, low unemployment and a booming economy.
We then had Abbott who was also good but after him it turned to shit till we got Scott. We have never had a Labor leader that is actually authentic.
I’ll support a female candidate when I feel that female is able to step in those shoes.