Lordo wrote:it seems there are seveal other reasons why he is building the canal outside of his selfish interest.
Istanbul Canal aims to minimise shipping traffic in the Bosporus. It is projected to have a capacity of 160 vessel transits a day – similar to the current volume of traffic through the Bosporus, where traffic congestion leaves ships queuing for days off to transit the strait.
Some analysts have speculated the main reason for the construction of the canal was to bypass the Montreux Convention, which limits the number and tonnage of ships from non-Black Sea powers that could enter the sea via the Bosporus.
In January 2018, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım announced that Istanbul Canal would not be subject to the Montreux Convention.
No, the Canal Istanbul will not be subject to Montreux Convention which means it will be used to generate income much like Suez and Panama Canals. The only problem is, whilst there are no alternative shortcut routes around Suez and Panama canals, there is a free passage on the Bosporus Straits, so what is the point building it? Well, it has more to do with developing both banks of the canal where rich Arabs have already bought great deal of real state with kickbacks no doubt to Erdogan and gang, but that won’t be enough as Erdogan wants to hamper the free passage through the Bosporus Straits anyway possible so to charge for the use of the canal instead, therefore I expect there to be serious increase in “accidents” to block the straits to that the canal is used instead for a fee. I get there are delays now to go through the strait, but the same is also the case at the Suez and Panama Canal. We had to wait about 4 days to transit the Panama Canal on my sailboat to get to the Pacific side, which took 2 days to go through it. It is normal to wait.
If the ground water gets mixed with salt water by building the canal, then Istanbul would become a very thirsty city for generations to come.