Get Real! wrote:It’s very simple Paphitis…
If it’s not a LICENSED & REGISTERED media network, that is ANSWERABLE to a MEDIA WATCH body of some country out there, then it’s not a news network but an amateur JUNK NEWS YouTube channel!
So news networks having differing opinions is not the problem, but they must be LICENSED & ANSWERABLE/ACCOUNTABLE, and have a physical address.
And the links you gave us with your so called evidence of a US BIO attack did not come from ANY of the established media anywhere, nor are they accountable for the hysterical anti USA rants.
You went to conspiracy sites.
My video wasn't a conspiracy site. It was an intelligent interview of a renowned economist of some international repute who were having an intelligent discussion about WHO and their negligence which was most certainly real. They did not push any agenda or conspiracy but discussed the merits of certain scenarios which is what intelligent people do.
I also posted a YouTube from Sky news which is a media establishment belonging to the biggest Media company in the world - Rupert Murdoch. I trust that meets your approval then because they have offices, channels, and papers in virtually most OECD countries globally. And they were a lot more scathing towards WHO.