Londonrake wrote:Perhaps you should catch Omicron. If it's as mild as is being reported you might then suffer a cold to bad flu for a couple of weeks. Afterwards, you'd acquire a natural immunity the envy of us all. That, without sacrificing your principled beliefs. No matter how much others might disagree with them.
Get Real! wrote:It’s pretty obvious from the Global Deaths table that these jabs aren’t working…
After so many millions getting jabbed, you’d expect to see significant improvement in deaths but I’m not seeing that…
Pyrpolizer wrote:Get Real! wrote:It’s pretty obvious from the Global Deaths table that these jabs aren’t working…
After so many millions getting jabbed, you’d expect to see significant improvement in deaths but I’m not seeing that…
You can't draw ANY conclusion from such graphs. Simply because the historical number of deaths depend on at least 3 more variables: the spread of the virus, the lock downs, and the vaccines.
But you CAN draw a trend-line from March 8 to March 31 when the deaths increased from zero to 7.5K to find out that without vaccines and without lockdowns we would today probably have millions of daily deaths before reaching the 60% herd immunity.
This article says 10X higher which imo is a very conservative estimate.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/ ... -1.4731580
Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Get Real! wrote:It’s pretty obvious from the Global Deaths table that these jabs aren’t working…
After so many millions getting jabbed, you’d expect to see significant improvement in deaths but I’m not seeing that…
You can't draw ANY conclusion from such graphs. Simply because the historical number of deaths depend on at least 3 more variables: the spread of the virus, the lock downs, and the vaccines.
But you CAN draw a trend-line from March 8 to March 31 when the deaths increased from zero to 7.5K to find out that without vaccines and without lockdowns we would today probably have millions of daily deaths before reaching the 60% herd immunity.
This article says 10X higher which imo is a very conservative estimate.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/ ... -1.4731580
It's the lock downs that kept COVID suppressed.
Prime examples, Australia, South Korea and New Zealand were the most locked down countries till only just recently. They had virtually no covid.
Now, all 3 have literally let it rip by lifting lock down. COVID is now prolific. And that is with a 90% vaccination rate of the eligible population.
In the hospitals, 90% of admissions and deaths are vaccinated too. And the government is not releasing that data. This indicates next to negligible efficacy of the current vaccines against Omicron.
There may have been some efficacy against Delta. But, the countries that showed the most success in the past were those countries that locked down very hard. And I mean proper lock down. Such as people unable to enter the country, or even leave the country. Only a handful of countries did that, and it was these countries that had the best results. In fact, Australia was able to wipe out COVID with these measures even when vaccine uptake was at 0%. New Zealand and Korea also. Maybe some other countries as well, like Vietnam which I hear was very successful.
That success has been wiped away because these countries decided to open up when their population was vaccinated. End result was a total disaster. COVID is now rampant in all these countries since they opened up.
Which you can argue that lock down was a waste of time since they were going to open up. You either open up and let it rip with no lock down, or if you decide to lock down, stay locked down.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Get Real! wrote:It’s pretty obvious from the Global Deaths table that these jabs aren’t working…
After so many millions getting jabbed, you’d expect to see significant improvement in deaths but I’m not seeing that…
You can't draw ANY conclusion from such graphs. Simply because the historical number of deaths depend on at least 3 more variables: the spread of the virus, the lock downs, and the vaccines.
But you CAN draw a trend-line from March 8 to March 31 when the deaths increased from zero to 7.5K to find out that without vaccines and without lockdowns we would today probably have millions of daily deaths before reaching the 60% herd immunity.
This article says 10X higher which imo is a very conservative estimate.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/ ... -1.4731580
It's the lock downs that kept COVID suppressed.
Prime examples, Australia, South Korea and New Zealand were the most locked down countries till only just recently. They had virtually no covid.
Now, all 3 have literally let it rip by lifting lock down. COVID is now prolific. And that is with a 90% vaccination rate of the eligible population.
In the hospitals, 90% of admissions and deaths are vaccinated too. And the government is not releasing that data. This indicates next to negligible efficacy of the current vaccines against Omicron.
There may have been some efficacy against Delta. But, the countries that showed the most success in the past were those countries that locked down very hard. And I mean proper lock down. Such as people unable to enter the country, or even leave the country. Only a handful of countries did that, and it was these countries that had the best results. In fact, Australia was able to wipe out COVID with these measures even when vaccine uptake was at 0%. New Zealand and Korea also. Maybe some other countries as well, like Vietnam which I hear was very successful.
That success has been wiped away because these countries decided to open up when their population was vaccinated. End result was a total disaster. COVID is now rampant in all these countries since they opened up.
Which you can argue that lock down was a waste of time since they were going to open up. You either open up and let it rip with no lock down, or if you decide to lock down, stay locked down.
Yes it's a waste of time talking with you. You didn't even understand what I said...
As for the efficacy of the vaccines, that's already been discussed, and proven from UK's data
FOR EVERY VACCINATED PERSON WHO DIES, THERE ARE 11 MORE UNVACCINATED WHO DIE.
Pyrpolizer wrote:You should learn to read what's proven from reliable sources rather than making it up.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ce-reports
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests