cyprusgrump wrote:Kikapu wrote:Some of you guys are not seeing the forest through the trees!
This crisis is not about body counts only. If it is going to be about body counts only based on Coronavirus vs. Flu related deaths, we are in the very early stages of the devastations to come yet on the Coronavirus related deaths.
Perhaps some of you might start seeing the forest through the trees then.
That may well be the case...
But was are told this is: -
1) Highly contageous
2) Deadly
So far it has been active since at least January (possibly November) and has clocked up just a million infections and 50,000 deaths from a World-wide population of 7bn.
It seems hard to believe at this stage that it is both 1) and 2)....
The truth is we do not have true numbers.
The numbers we have if they can be believed are based on testing done, which is a tiny % vs. world’s population.
Just how many people have died from Coronavirus related but was labeled death by flu related illnesses before the world took notice? Even when China reported the outbreak, the rest of the world went on business as usual for another few months. Even today, many poor countries are not testing despite deaths piling up on the streets like Ecuador, but no answers to the cause of those deaths as no tests has been done.