Get Real! wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:German lawyer Rainer Fuellmich, a leading member of the COVID - 19 Extraparliamentary Inquiry Committee in Germany, sets out how an international network of lawyers is planning to sue those responsible for the covid scandal, initially through the North American and German courts, and possible later elsewhere:
You are evading the all-important question... how does this “great power” benefit from shutting the world down?
Answer with a nice little numbered
LIST using your own words. No need for links, no need for Youtube… just tap into your brain and put it to work.
Thank you for your question, although I must confess I am somewhat astonished by your objection to links since you are someone who in the past has frequently called on posters to back up their claims with links to reliable sources, and I think doing so is an important component of intelligent debate.
I am also astonished by your question since I recently replied to the very same question from you. I notice that Kikapu also constantly asks me this self-same question even though I have given my answer to it on each occasion. I think this points to the existence of some sort of cognitive dissonance which I do not really understand. I consider you both to be highly intelligent people who approach everything critically. For example, when the mainstream media told you that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and this was the reason for invading Iraq, I am sure you were not convinced by this. I am sure you will agree with my analysis certain powerful forces in the world had in interest in invading that country, and the weapons of mass destruction lie was perpetrated by the mainstream media to provide a pretext for that invasion. Surely, if the mainstream media can be used in this way on one occasion, we have to be on our guard that this may happen on another.
The question you are asking is essentially the one of cui bono, and it is perfectly valid. This, of course, is the question I asked you when you claimed the American deep state deliberately released a dangerous, highly contagious virus in China when it must have been obvious that a highly contagious virus would rapidly spread throughout the world causing great destruction. So, cui bono? Why did the American deep state do this? Who did it benefit and how? Of course, the same question is valid for the deliberate destruction of the world economy based on hysterical and exaggerated mainstream media coverage of what, at worst, is a disease less dangerous than the flu, and which, given that the virus still has to be isolated and no scientific proof such as satisfying Koch’s postulates has been provided that it causes the disease it is said to, may not even exist. Who benefits from this destruction?
In the first place, there is a simple verifiable fact which I have demonstrated using a link to a reliable source above. The net wealth of American billionaires has increased significantly this year, despite the destruction of the world economy. OK, I am complying with your arbitrary and puzzling ban on links in this reply, but I could give you a wealth of evidence showing that the global super rich have not suffered financially during this so-called pandemic. If you look at the share prices of what are called the “tech” stocks such as Amazon, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft or Facebook they have all skyrocketed this year. Neither the megarich nor the megacorporations that deliver their wealth have suffered at all as the masses are thrown out of work and see their small businesses shut down. In fact, the shutting down of small businesses is grist to the mill of the megacorporations. So, perhaps, those who suggest that the destruction of the world economy on the back of irrational hysteria whipped up by the mainstream media may be part of a plan being orchestrated by the global ruling class do not even have to answer the question cui bono, since the latter have not been negatively affected by these events.
Even so, we can speculate why they would wish to drive the bulk of humanity into destitution and what they would have to gain from this. And, the short answer is that I do not know for certain. If there does exist a grand game plan behind it all, I am not privy to it. All I can do is examine the available information and try to put a picture together. As I see it there are various competing explanations:
1. Having tried and ultimately failed to keep the global economy going with quantitative easing since the 2008 crash, a massive collapse was imminent so why not use a virus as the scapegoat when it happens? In other words, it is not to anybody’s financial benefit (which is contradicted by the information in the above paragraph) but helps to deflect blame for the collapse away from those responsible for it.
2. Big pharma is making huge profits from things like selling tests (which are so inaccurate as to be totally useless) and stands to profit handsomely from the much touted vaccine. In fact, it is already doing so because governments are channelling massive amounts of taxpayers’ money in its direction for vaccines that have not even been developed. (Personally, I hope and pray this just ends up with big pharma injecting everyone with some useless placebo, the mainstream media under its control then starts regaling us with glorious story after story about the pandemic that never existed in the first place ending and at least life can return to normal, albeit with the majority of us impoverished as a result of this heist on an unprecedented scale of taxpayers’ money by big pharma) In other words, everyone else suffers – although, as I have shown above, the megarich are not suffering at all - but big pharma profits handsomely.
3. A major transition to a new kind of society – the kind of thing the World Economic Forum is discussing under the rubrics of the “great reset” and the “fourth industrial revolution” – is being engineered and there are those who argue that this will take a form in which the masses are stripped of many of the rights they currently enjoy and reduced to poverty and placed under totalitarian rule in which they are subject to tight surveillance using new technologies that are being developed and will enable this. If you look at everything that has happened since the so-called pandemic started, you can clearly discern a move in this direction with the pandemic used as the pretext. In this case, driving people into poverty and ruining most small and medium-sized businesses is both the end goal, anyway, so the question of cui bono does not arise (and as I have shown the superrich are not suffering during this process) and also helps to facilitate the process. By reducing people to poverty and making them dependent on state handouts, you make them easier to control and make resistance harder. Everything seems to revolve around the mandatory injection that is coming and there are those who believe that the true aim is to inject something into our bodies that in conjunction with 5G that is being rolled out at breakneck speed will enable us to be controlled and monitored in a way that was previously inconceivable (I know I am not permitted links but you can find the views along these lines of your fellow committed Christian Dr Christiane Northrup in a link I provided earlier; just one person’s opinion, of course). If this is the case, then the whole process of destroying the economy thereby driving small businesses out of existence and the masses into penury and imposing lockdowns and restrictions thereby driving people into depression and despair will in the end serve the purpose of forcing the people into surrender and securing mass acceptance for the vaccine that will supposedly enable life to return to normal and people to return to work and reopen their businesses. It will be sad if they wake up to find themselves having been enslaved instead. The advantage for the global ruling class in the end is that it will have massively consolidated its power, have the masses under its tight control and surveillance thus making any potential revolt or revolution difficult if not impossible and will have further monopolized its control of world resources. And, as I have shown above, the superrich are not suffering financially in the meantime.
So, I really hope the above ideas go some way towards addressing your question and you will not find the need to ask it yet again. Ultimately, I don’t know for sure but some ulterior motive appears to be lurking behind the panic and fear being whipped up over very little.
Anyway, I am sure you will agree it pays to be sceptical and keep alternative possibilities in mind. For example, I would also love to discuss the theory that the American deep state released the virus in Wuhan. So, now it is your turn. Cui bono? Who benefits from this and how?