Kikapu wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:Kikapu wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:Kikapu wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:Coronavirus: Government suspends publication of daily UK-wide death toll over accuracy concernsThe UK government has halted the publication of the daily number of coronavirus deaths over concerns that "statistical flaws" might be rendering the data inaccurate.
The pause in publication was decided by the Department of Health and Social Care after the health secretary, Matt Hancock, ordered a review into the figures.
A study by academics published late this week suggested that the toll is subject to "over-exaggeration" because of the way Public Health England (PHE) measures deaths.
A statement on the government's website read: "The secretary of state has today, 17 July, asked PHE to urgently review their estimation of daily death statistics.
"Currently the daily deaths measure counts all people who have tested positive for coronavirus and since died, with no cut-off between time of testing and date of death.
Is this not how cancer illnesses are counted and heart condition illnesses are counted and diabetic illnesses are counted and so on!
No.
You think if you have a heart attack and then get run over by a bus six months later they record the death as heart attack...
You are wrong. Cancer patient remains a cancer patient until he/she dies from cancer related death much later. How many times have you heard that Mr. so and so has been battling cancer for many years before dying.
So, how many Corvid -19 “recovered” patients died under a bus but counted as died from coronavirus.?
Your article does not mention anyone dying under a bus by the way. Do not add anything to the article you have posted if it’s not already written, for you to make exaggerated statements. It may be true in another article, but not in the one you want ride with.
I know for an absolute 1,000% FACT that I am correct and you are wrong...
FFS! If somebody has cancer for years (a friend is just about to die from it after 10 years BTW) of course they get put down as a cancer death if the cancer kills them...
If they get run over by a bus while fighting cancer they do not - you are now simply making this up as you go along ErLolz, I mean Kiks....
Sorry about your cancer I’ll friend.
The point is, once a cancer patient, always a cancer patient, even when not sick all the time from it.
No, you are completely wrong!
You are as wrong as Bordo believing Labour would win the election or CoCo believing Hunt would be the next Conservative leader....
It simply doesn't work that way, hence the outrage at the PHE Covid figures...
What is bizarre (and I can't be arsed to look up the figures at the moment) is that they apply some statistical formula to every single death.... In the UK anyway.
So when somebody dies (from any cause, bus runneth over, cancer, murdered, etc.), they are counted as something like 0.2% of 'Alcohol Related Death'... And probably some % of smoking related and some % of some other shite (obesity?)...?
So when you see the figures of x,000 people dieing from booze and x,000 from the fags many of those would never had a drink or a smoke.... The whole thing is a farce...
But no, they don't count people run over by a bus as a cancer death because they had cancer...