Tim Drayton wrote:There is a need to distinguish between criticism of the juristic entity known as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the person called Bill Gates, and not to conflate both as "Gates-based conspiracy theories". I would be interested to know what counts as "conspiracy theories" in the following report given that there are 247 footnotes to back up the claims made:
https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/ ... sion_2.pdf
There are no conspiracy theories in this report. The report however is not saying what you are saying about Gates or his Foundation, which often are conspiracy theories or bordering on them or indirectly supportive of them.
We are not suggesting that Bill Gates is insincere in his desire to help poor people and developing countries. Neither are we suggesting that some BMGF-funded projects are not positive; many are. A 2009 editorial in the medical journal The Lancet praised the BMGF for giving: “a massive boost to global health funding .. . The Foundation has challenged the world to think big and to be more ambitious about what can be done to save lives in low-income settings. The Foundation has added renewed dynamism, credibility, and attractiveness to global health [as a cause]”.9 Many other projects that the BMGF funds are also important, not least NGO and academic policy
and advocacy work that might otherwise not be promoted all due to lack of funds.
Unlike the authors of this well written and researched report you ARE systematically suggesting and saying that Gates is insincere in his motivations for creating and funding the foundation. You systematically distort reality to suit your agenda like you absurd speculations on how much profit there will be for big pharma from covid-19 vaccine and as you do when you try and make out this report supports the view you have been pushing about Gates here. Either you are just spectacularly bad at explaining what you actually mean or you are attempting to distort what this report does claim in order to make it out it supports views you have expressed here repeatedly that it does NOT support.