erolz66 wrote:Will you be buying American lube or making your own to build up and protect Australian lube manufacturing ?
Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Will you be buying American lube or making your own to build up and protect Australian lube manufacturing ?
No, we don't have any requirements for lube.
we have many countries to trade with and are better off without the Chy-nese.
erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Will you be buying American lube or making your own to build up and protect Australian lube manufacturing ?
No, we don't have any requirements for lube.
we have many countries to trade with and are better off without the Chy-nese.
So why were you not doing so already ?
Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Will you be buying American lube or making your own to build up and protect Australian lube manufacturing ?
No, we don't have any requirements for lube.
we have many countries to trade with and are better off without the Chy-nese.
So why were you not doing so already ?
We are!
No one actually foresees too much of an issue. our Government, and our people are not worried. in fact, we are laughing at the Chy-nese. we think they are a joke.
fancy putting tariffs on barley and not on the products that would screw them to kingdom come. Imagine if Australia clicks its fingers and stops all resource trade with Chy-na.
Apple products for starters will be valued higher than gold per ounce.
that's the thing with Chy-na. Everything is for domestic consumption on their front but when it comes to the real crunch, Australia has got them over a barrel. we have far greater power over them than they do over us.
Our resources won't remain unsold because of Chy-na ceasing to buy them. We can sell our resources to any country of our choosing. They will always be traded because we are major international resource suppliers.
erolz66 wrote:If Oz has always had any number of countries other than China it could easily sell it's products too then why today and for how ever many decades previously is and has China been its biggest single trading partner by far ? It does not make sense to me ? Did China only recently become the Devil ? If you always had other countries you could have sold too for the last 20 years then why did you sell to China at all ?
erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Will you be buying American lube or making your own to build up and protect Australian lube manufacturing ?
No, we don't have any requirements for lube.
we have many countries to trade with and are better off without the Chy-nese.
So why were you not doing so already ?
We are!
No one actually foresees too much of an issue. our Government, and our people are not worried. in fact, we are laughing at the Chy-nese. we think they are a joke.
fancy putting tariffs on barley and not on the products that would screw them to kingdom come. Imagine if Australia clicks its fingers and stops all resource trade with Chy-na.
Apple products for starters will be valued higher than gold per ounce.
that's the thing with Chy-na. Everything is for domestic consumption on their front but when it comes to the real crunch, Australia has got them over a barrel. we have far greater power over them than they do over us.
Our resources won't remain unsold because of Chy-na ceasing to buy them. We can sell our resources to any country of our choosing. They will always be traded because we are major international resource suppliers.
You have not really answered my question I feel.
The question is
If Oz has always had any number of countries other than China it could easily sell it's products too then why today and for how ever many decades previously is and has China been its biggest single trading partner by far ? It does not make sense to me ? Did China only recently become the Devil ? If you always had other countries you could have sold too for the last 20 years then why did you sell to China at all ?
Kikapu wrote:... that doesn't necessarily mean the virus has changed, since death-rate calculations depend on how many cases are confirmed by tests. The high global death rate could point to coronavirus testing limitations across the globe.
Tim Drayton wrote:Kikapu wrote:... that doesn't necessarily mean the virus has changed, since death-rate calculations depend on how many cases are confirmed by tests. The high global death rate could point to coronavirus testing limitations across the globe.
Yes, indeed. It all depends on what you put in the denominator. That's why the figures are skewed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests