erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:I'll give you a clue. How many cases per million does the US have compared to all those countries I mentioned?
You have no clue.
is that all you got to the point I made on cases per million?
That wouldn't be because you have nowhere to go?
Why do you resort to these kinds of sweeping statements saying I have no clue when it is YOU that mentioned the data in the first place and ignored the population based cases per million dataset which is critical because it compares countries with different populations?
Dumb bastard!
No it is because talking to you is literally like talking to a brick wall.
The whole point that the video that RW posted makes is that it is exactly looking at the data in the way you do here that are so meaningless and why they are meaningless if what you want to understand who is and who is not getting on top of this thing. That is the
entire point of the video made by intelligent people without agenda and politics and they do an excellent job. You just fail to understand anything in that video and then start quoting stats that CAN NOT TELL YOU if a country is doing well or badly vs others as the VIDEO EXPLAINS.
Any countries cases per head of population was different yesterday than it is today and will be even more different tomorrow. That is what exponential MEANS. The spread did not start in all countries all at the same time. This is all explained in the video.
That is why I say you have no clue. Not because I have no argument to make. It is because you CAN NOT UNDERSTAND the argument ALREADY MADE in the video by people far more intelligent than you or me.
I don't have a problem with the video RW posted.
I have an issue with your cheeky comment about my "alternative" news sources, some of which were talking about exponential growth way before that video came out. No matter what content they come up with, they are deemed by you ideologues as "not intelligent"because only YOU have a mortgage on intelligence but not others who do not subscribe to your ideology.
I generally have an open mind to all sources, and even consult the Guardian for comic relief. I even posted many BBC links here, but that wouldn't be a source I would look at for a resemblance of balance with regards to issues like BREXIT. They were a good laugh though, especially when BORIS won. I like my pluralism and freedom of expression, and then I make my mind up.
You are making sweeping statements which are untrue and downright stupid.