I don’t think China wants to use hard power to get what they want, because their soft power is working very well.
Anyway, back to the topic on this thread.
Kikapu wrote:I don’t think China wants to use hard power to get what they want, because their soft power is working very well.
Anyway, back to the topic on this thread.
Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:I don’t think China wants to use hard power to get what they want, because their soft power is working very well.
Anyway, back to the topic on this thread.
I can't not imagine you Kikapu, supporting the reduction of US power and spending in light of what is going on. Who is going to stand in China's way if not the USA? The EU???
repulsewarrior wrote:...indeed, it is not the weapons in your possession that is the measure of strength per se, it is the capacity to build them quickly, and in quantity; so said George Bush when director of the CIA, and he is in my opinion quite correct.
...Iraq, Baghdad, the world, would have been a different place if, with the ''shock and awe'', Americans had been prepared to save the Museum in Baghdad. History will judge them badly, what with what Humanity lost.
...indeed, there will always be the poor among us, so says the Bible in the words of Jesus Christ. In everything there is balance. If there are poor who suffer, in such a society, there must be those with what is too much, such is the inescapable logic of the binomial curve.
Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:I don’t think China wants to use hard power to get what they want, because their soft power is working very well.
Anyway, back to the topic on this thread.
I can't not imagine you Kikapu, supporting the reduction of US power and spending in light of what is going on. Who is going to stand in China's way if not the USA? The EU???
The US does not need to reduce the power that we already have, just not keep increasing it. If couple of thousand nuclear weapons are not enough, than what is? Wasted money just sitting in silos when thousands are sleeping on the streets of San Francisco and all over the country. Many are ex military who are damaged from wars that their country forgot them. No, we need to take care of these homeless instead of adding more nuclear weapons to our arsenals, weapons that will never be used......again.
Last time I was in London few months ago, the homelessness is also getting bad there, people sleeping in underpasses for pedestrians. So yes, there is poverty in the UK also, but who cares, right? After all, the majority of people in all these developed nations are doing alright for themselves so why help the needy. The country does not need the needy as they are just sponging of the rest of us, right...fuckers!
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests