erolz66 wrote:Londonrake wrote:... with associated temperate political views.
What does this actually mean to you ? For example do you consider Paphitis has 'temperate political views' ? CG ? Me ?
I ask because from where I am sitting it is easy to assume that by 'temperate political views' what you really mean is, the degree to which you personally consider a political view 'temperate' or not is a direct function of the degree to which such views are similar to your own or not. I do not like to 'assume' such things, so I am asking directly.
Cherry picking in extremis. Odd, given your own propensity for verbosity.
I was clearly responding to Lordo and submit that his views are far removed from any definition of temperate. His manner and language, routine employment of coarse expletives, use of OTT hate filled insults “Swines” “Parasites” et al make that self evident. None of those I referred to or you mention would speak to others in terms of “fackin Kants, you talk shit boy” and many other such charming expressions. It isn’t the Johnsons of this world that give you the political prisoners, gulags, secret police, executions, etc when they gain power, it’s the likes of Lordo.
I‘ve been an interested observer of UK politics for a long time. Basically from the “You’ve never had it so good” days of “Supermac” up until the present. In all that time I can say, with hand on heart, I’ve never known any politician - of any party - less suited to be Prime Minister of the UK than Jeremy Corbyn. Given the extent of that field it says much. Those who try to pass the man off as a figure of integrity, trustworthy and a leader clearly have no interest in his past and are IMHO delusional. That’s why I think his becoming PM is such an inviting prospect.