Lordo wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:
that's bullshit and you know it. till b'stard came to power he voted against everything may did. he is the leading frustrator of the parliamentary system spaffing all over the wall. soon as he came to power he pretended he was able to remove the backstop by actually implementing it and putting the border in the irish sea. and of course it was cummings' idea to just blame parliament for all the failings of the tory government for the last 3 years. well in fact parliament had voted for his wa even though it was worse than may's deal becasue they knew that the real trade talks will begin after january and the fakker chickened out and instead of taking his wa through parlaiment he asked for an election and his only policy was brexit. talk of a disingenuous kant if ever there was one. if you want to have a vote on brexit, take the wa though parliament, get a deal and put it to the people. nooooo thats too easy he needs to muddy the water.
but don't you worry about a thing. we are in the same place as we were in 2016 and we will be in the same place as even if b'stards manages to get a slim majorrity which is unlikely. he is still in denial and will not confirm that no deal is an option claiming he will get a deal. so what if he does not, he will try to get a no deal through which is what he promised nige and dup. nige being the stupid kant that he is believed him but dup know that even with no deal there is going to be a border down the irish sea. so there is no way they will make a deal with tories on the 13th. i suspect if he goes down the line of no deal, there will be a few more tory mps that will abandan the sinking ship. notice he says he has 630 mps who support his deal, and of course he does not say they will support his government with or without a deal. i would have though rather than admit that no deal is not an option for tactical reason in the negotiations, why not say he supports a brexit with or without a deal. now that will be very honest becasue that is what he suports and he will not be in anyway disadvantaging himself in the negotiations if he should win.
and of course racist kants like you will claim that no deal was never off the table and therefore a legitimate option even if it is not mentioned.
like fak it is.
if he wants it as an option he has to declare it.
btw while you are at it, perhaps you can explain why exactly he cannot declare that if he cannot get a deal by the end of 2020, he will leave without a deal. is there any reason on earth why he will not say such a thing? or is it becasue he is scared shitless.
he had no problem saying we will leave do or die whhat exactly is wrong with saying we will leave end of 2020 with or without a deal.
explain?
The only thing we need to explain to you is that in a few days it's all over.
You can go back to your kebabs. Still waiting for your Fatsatime.
