The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


labour manifesto

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: labour manifesto

Postby cyprusgrump » Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:07 pm

Lordo wrote:oh dearie me. b'stard offers people earning between 50k to 80k 9billion tax cut per year and you boys have no worries about that, while people are dying with nothing in their stomachs in the uk and you are having kittens over a promise of free dental checks which will cost 450million a year, which will make sure everybody can get their teeth checked so they don't end up in hospital taking up a bed needed for far more serious illness.

this was what labour introduced in 1945 and it is visionary to recognise the importance of it and bring it back. medical teeth decay prevention for all.

now this is civilisation the start of.



You've heard of The Laffer Curve have you...? :roll:

You probably have but won't acknowledge it.

I saw the results of a poll recently, Labour voters were asked if they supported taxing 'The Rich' more even if it reduced tax revenues...

They replied 'yes' by an overwhelming majority.

Labour. The politics of spite and envy... :evil:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: labour manifesto

Postby Lordo » Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:28 pm

cyprusgrump wrote:
Lordo wrote:oh dearie me. b'stard offers people earning between 50k to 80k 9billion tax cut per year and you boys have no worries about that, while people are dying with nothing in their stomachs in the uk and you are having kittens over a promise of free dental checks which will cost 450million a year, which will make sure everybody can get their teeth checked so they don't end up in hospital taking up a bed needed for far more serious illness.

this was what labour introduced in 1945 and it is visionary to recognise the importance of it and bring it back. medical teeth decay prevention for all.

now this is civilisation the start of.



You've heard of The Laffer Curve have you...? :roll:

You probably have but won't acknowledge it.

I saw the results of a poll recently, Labour voters were asked if they supported taxing 'The Rich' more even if it reduced tax revenues...

They replied 'yes' by an overwhelming majority.

Labour. The politics of spite and envy... :evil:

that is a jolly good myth. give it up. the days when corporations got away with not paying tax is over. if they trade in uk, they will pay their taxes in uk. loopholes will be closed.
Prime minister's husband's investment firm has paid NO corporation tax in eight years. how can they pay less tax under any circumstances if they are not paying anything now. unless they claim unemployent benefit.

you are full of bullshit and you know it.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22284
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: labour manifesto

Postby Londonrake » Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:00 pm

Spot on.

Image
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: labour manifesto

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:22 am

Lordo wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
Lordo wrote:oh dearie me. b'stard offers people earning between 50k to 80k 9billion tax cut per year and you boys have no worries about that, while people are dying with nothing in their stomachs in the uk and you are having kittens over a promise of free dental checks which will cost 450million a year, which will make sure everybody can get their teeth checked so they don't end up in hospital taking up a bed needed for far more serious illness.

this was what labour introduced in 1945 and it is visionary to recognise the importance of it and bring it back. medical teeth decay prevention for all.

now this is civilisation the start of.



You've heard of The Laffer Curve have you...? :roll:

You probably have but won't acknowledge it.

I saw the results of a poll recently, Labour voters were asked if they supported taxing 'The Rich' more even if it reduced tax revenues...

They replied 'yes' by an overwhelming majority.

Labour. The politics of spite and envy... :evil:

that is a jolly good myth. give it up. the days when corporations got away with not paying tax is over. if they trade in uk, they will pay their taxes in uk. loopholes will be closed.
Prime minister's husband's investment firm has paid NO corporation tax in eight years. how can they pay less tax under any circumstances if they are not paying anything now. unless they claim unemployent benefit.

you are full of bullshit and you know it.


Not a myth, simple, observable fact - and common sense too. :wink:

If you increase tax there is more incentive for taxpayers to spend time (and money) to reduce their tax burden. People will also stop working extra hours if the money they get paid for it mostly goes on tax.

Remind me again, how much extra tax do you voluntarily pay to HMRC over and above what you owe...?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: labour manifesto

Postby erolz66 » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:20 am

Yeah but what makes you or your Tory friends sole arbiters of where the curve peak is ?
erolz66
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:31 pm

Re: labour manifesto

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:54 pm

erolz66 wrote:Yeah but what makes you or your Tory friends sole arbiters of where the curve peak is ?



Are they? :shock:

Did they still set the curve peak when Labour was in power...?
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: labour manifesto

Postby erolz66 » Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:06 pm

cyprusgrump wrote:
erolz66 wrote:Yeah but what makes you or your Tory friends sole arbiters of where the curve peak is ?



Are they? :shock:

Did they still set the curve peak when Labour was in power...?


Your apparent belief is that Labour tax polices will result in a lower tax take. It is nothing more than that, a belief. That you then try and present it as a 'fact' and quote the laffer curve as you 'evidence' just indicates to me how little interest you have other than just saying over and over 'I am right you are wrong' as if just saying it over and over can make it true.

It never ceases to amaze me that those ardent leave voters, who bang on about having faith and belief in the UK's capacity and ability to make its way in the world alone as a nation of entrepreneurs and traders will also argue 'you can not tax the rich because they just fuck off if you try'. The contradictions are glaring to me.
erolz66
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:31 pm

Re: labour manifesto

Postby Lordo » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:02 pm

music to my ears. it makes so much sense.
<<<The nationalisation of water, energy grids and the Royal Mail would save UK households £7.8bn a year and pay for itself within seven years, according to new academic research.

A report by Greenwich University’s Public Service International Research Unit put the total cost of compensation to private sector owners at just £49.7bn – around a quarter of the widely quoted £196bn price tag calculated by the CBI last month, which also covered rail.

Labour’s manifesto for the 12 December general election is expected to include commitments to take the rail network, National Grid, water and mail delivery back into public hands.

PSIRU director David Hall said his estimates were based on compensating shareholders for the amount they have invested in utilities being taken into public hands, rather than paying out a “market value” price as the CBI suggested.

Savings are calculated by comparing the current cost of dividends and interest paid by private companies to the cost of refinancing with debt raised by issuing government bonds.>>>

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nationalise-royal-mail-energy-water-savings-bills-national-grid-a9203636.html
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22284
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: labour manifesto

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:25 pm

Lordo wrote:music to my ears. it makes so much sense.
<<<The nationalisation of water, energy grids and the Royal Mail would save UK households £7.8bn a year and pay for itself within seven years, according to new academic research.

A report by Greenwich University’s Public Service International Research Unit put the total cost of compensation to private sector owners at just £49.7bn – around a quarter of the widely quoted £196bn price tag calculated by the CBI last month, which also covered rail.

Labour’s manifesto for the 12 December general election is expected to include commitments to take the rail network, National Grid, water and mail delivery back into public hands.

PSIRU director David Hall said his estimates were based on compensating shareholders for the amount they have invested in utilities being taken into public hands, rather than paying out a “market value” price as the CBI suggested.

Savings are calculated by comparing the current cost of dividends and interest paid by private companies to the cost of refinancing with debt raised by issuing government bonds.>>>

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nationalise-royal-mail-energy-water-savings-bills-national-grid-a9203636.html


I'm sure it makes sense to readers of The Independent' the least independent left wing 'newspaper' on the news stand... :lol:

...and of course those Socialists that think The Groaniad is 'the best newspaper'... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: labour manifesto

Postby Lordo » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 pm

what is the price of the company?

i am sure the government will look at the profitability and the hole in their pension pot before offering them a fair price but of course government can easily buy them at a price they see fit.

just to give you an idea here are some examples

DIY chain Homebase has been sold for just £1
In 2015, Sir Philip Green sold the BHS department store chain for £1
City Link was bought by investment firm Better Capital for £1 in April 2013.
Better Capital paid £13m for the publisher in April 2010 but admitted defeat just under four years later and sold it for £1 to Mike Luckwell
After Swansea City FC was relegated to the third division in 2001, the Welsh football club's owners sold it for the princely sum of £1.
Ken Bates paid a token £1 for Chelsea way back in 1982 - but also took on debts totalling some £1.5m.
not fogetting ing that also went for £1.

it is time baby.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22284
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests