Pyrpolizer wrote:Thank you so much Erolz for your time in writing all this.
It's been a long time that I 've read and learned anything new in this forum.
Yes I 've read the article and I will go on later and read the comments on my Huawei (android).
Thank you for the comments. I write such things first and foremost for myself but such comments as yours above are appreciated. I was wrong about the 'below the line' needing an android device to view. They can be seen on the web version of the site. You just have to scroll down all the way and click the 'see more comments' to see more than just the selected couple viewable by default.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Boarding schools are cruelty to the ultimate degree, I mean how could any parent send their children to such a jungle is beyond me.
I thought such things did not exist any more, but alas, they do in the UK!
Boarding is a major element, probably the single biggest potentially damaging element. I have thought of framing my position in terms of 'boarding schools' but the issues do go beyond that alone imo. I do not know of any traditional British public school that is exclusively boarding. However boarding is a defining element of the kind of school, school structure, that I am talking about. All the 'top' public schools feature boarding. Eaton, Harrow, Westminster, St Paul, Rugby etc etc. Nor is boarding some service provided merely for the convenience of those who simply live to far away. It is integral to what these schools sell. If you want your child to experience the full public school system , then they should board, according to such schools. Just look at the websites (sales pitches) of any of these schools, mine included and you can see this. I was a day boy at Aldwickbury until my final year there (aged 12-13) but became I 'weekly boarder' for my final year, meaning I would go home at weekends. This was sold, forcefully, by the school to my parents and of course such 'up-selling' was in no way connected to the additional 'not profit' such accrued for the school.
Having said that I do not want to be totally one sided here. There are and can be positive 'flavours' to boarding school like 'summer camp' and 'adventure' and 'living with and being surrounded by friends' and the best 'housemasters' can and do create atmosphere's and environments that are more akin to a large extended family than to say borstal. However these are secondary or tertiary 'flavours' compared to the primary and dominant ones, which are much 'darker' imo.
I am also very very wary of 'universal' statements like 'how could any parent do such to their own child'. There is for me a massive difference with sending your child to a boarding school at say the age of 11 and with the full and enthusiastic consent of the child and sending one there at the age of say 7 and regardless of what the child themselves want. I have discussed my views with an ex public school boarder recently who actively wanted, at the age of 12, to be sent to boarding school. Londonrake describes similar in terms of his daughter. I do recognise the difference 'age' and 'consent' make here, in terms of specific individual examples.
Pyrpolizer wrote:You do have a real case to declare the boarding schools illegal and damaging to children Erolz.
Certainly if all a government could get passed through was some restriction only of the use of boarding in schools like these then I would welcome such as a massive 'step in the right direction'.
Pyrpolizer wrote:I am not so much against private schools, but boarding schools for Christ sake, to this modern day? You have my full support to uproot this anachronism.
Indeed there is much nuance here for any willing to explore such. I also have no real issue with the idea of people being able to pay to have their children educated should they wish to do that. I do have issue with them paying to have their children educated within a structure that is potentially damaging to a degree I believe is no longer acceptable. This is one of the reason why which 'label' to use when trying to explain my position is so difficult. Independent school does not allow for the differentiation between a fee paying school that is not structurally brutal, which do exist, and those that are. Public school is inherently misleading and confusing. In a way the term 'boarding school' does describe the kind of schools I am talking about most accurately. Or to steal the description from the book linked to in my post above, schools that follow the 'British and colonial preparatory and public boarding school tradition'. These are the schools I am talking about, not just any school that charges. They are institutions from an earlier age, an age of work houses. We stopped sending our children to work houses a long time ago.
There is a similar 'nuance' for me in terms of 'discipline' and 'structure'. I am not against discipline or structure in schools at all. Although not a parent myself, as an uncle and as someone who has 'worked' with children, I am on any comparative spectrum, well past the 'half way' mark compared to any sort of general average. I am not against discipline in schools. I am against unnecessarily brutalising discipline. Not against structure, etc etc.
Drugs. Now there is an interesting question imo. Are you kids more or less likely to 'encounter' drugs and drug use in a state school than a private one ? My gut feeling would be on this aspect would be the risk is probably about the same. Certainly there was no 'shortage' of such exposure in the School I was at and there are plenty of reports of top public schools having issues with drug use at their schools.