Lordo wrote:do you find it as funny as in the south where the ministers are not elected as mps and then get selected by the president. and this is in some way more democratic. you really have converted to a worse ass than the rest of your fanatics. a lot of fanatics start as a fanatic but they mellow down, you have bucked the trend.
of course you have your own opinion and i thonk you know all about opinions and what is said about them. we all have one right?
As to solving the cyprus problem. you really is blind as a bat.
Listen towhat akinci says about the talks and the un and then if you still don't see it, it is not just glasses you need, its a new brain. may i reccomend the brain of a navvi as it will have less milage on it.
this is the best thing i have read for a very long time.
https://cyprus-mail.com/2019/11/02/secu ... ripartite/<<<Paragraph 15 of the resolution adopted last July says that the Security Council requests the Secretary-General to submit by 15 November 2019 a report on his Good Offices, in particular on progress towards reaching a consensus starting point for
[list=40[i]]meaningful results-oriented negotiations leading to a settlement.[/list][/i]>>
read, read and read again and again and again. and then one more time repeat.
Not only the system in the occupied is undemocratic (by stealing the people's votes for MPs turning them to Ministers) but it also breaks the principle of separation of powers by obliging the "president" to form a cabinet using members of the "parliament". Hence both the executive and the legislative are the same. The worse of it is that it doesn't even work!
It could work if the head of the executive was the PM elected directly from the parliament just like in all other Parliamentary democracies. But then again look at the UK where BOJO lost support in the Parliament and got his hands tied. The same happened in Greece when Tsipras lost the majority and had no other option than resign.
Still the geniuses in the occupied decided to elect the head of the State directly from the people, but at the same time forcing him to form a cabinet using members of the Parliament. Hence Akinci decides one thing and Tatar (the PM) +Ozersay do exactly the opposite.
instead of throwing curses use your little brain to work it out instead of trying to convince me that the pseudo system is a working democracy. Wear your presbyopia glasses and tell us how Akinci can decide about anything when he doesn't even have one MP of his own in the "parliament" and 7 out of 10 ministers are partitionists.
Perhaps the whole system in the occupied was a trick designed to confuse both the GCs and the outside world of who exactly decides in the occupied.
As for your meaningless link, sure the talks may start once again. As soon as they are about to reach something Akinci (the decorative figure who has absolutely no power) will be ordered to find ways to terminate them. Or else Chavusoglu from Ankara will do it, like he did in Gans Montana. A total waste of time using Akinci as a decorative puppet figure.... It happened before and will be repeated for as long as necessary. This is Ankara's plan, this is the plan of the partitionists in the occupied, who were always holding the vast majority of seats in the "Cabinet"...