Paphitis wrote:A plan the EU can either accept or reject. Either way its a win win for Boris because even if the plan is rejected, Boris can turn around and say "we tried". My Government tried to get a deal.
Sure he can and will say that but how many people will actually believe it is true ? How many believed that proroguing parliament for the specific 5 weeks he tried to do so for, was motivated solely by a desire to start a new session of parliament and have a queens speech laying out the governments up coming legislative agenda and nothing to do with trying to block parliament from being able to exercise it's sovereignty ? Creating the narrative is easy. Getting others to subscribe to the narrative rather than identify it as just such, a narrative or 'story' or 'fiction' made up for a purpose, is a much harder challenge. Harder still when the 'obviousness' of what he is doing and why is clear even to fine probing minds like your own Paphitis
Paphitis wrote:An extension automatically becomes more untenable. that is if there is a request which there will not be unless there is a Coup from the swamp dwellers across the benches.
I do find it amusing that you consider the (minority) of alligators that support your views on Brexit to not be alligators at all and that only those alligators that disagree with you on Brexit are alligators. I have some news for you mate. They are ALL alligators, all swamp dwellers and Parliament and government is the swamp. Unless Johnson has some plan to reduce the number of MP's to 350 rather than the 650 currently there aint gonna be and can not be any 'draining of the swamp'. Just a slightly different bunch of swamp dwellers living in the same swamp as ever, some of which will share views with you and others will not to varying degrees over varying subjects over time. If you really believe the 'draining the swamp' story, then you really do need to try and be a bit less naive imo.