Cyprus-Forum.com

[cyprusgrump]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

Or we could just have a GE, let the people kick out the Remoaner MPs and start again with a pro Brexit parliament...?

[Lordo]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

my brexshitter friends claim the people opposing no-deal have no plans. they also show lack of understanding by claiming we are all remainers. in fact one achievement of manchild is the uniting of all those who oppose no-deal to one aim.

now here is the plan.

step one - wait till 19th of october.

step two - have a look at what manchild has done to that point. he should have done two things.
1. bring back a deal
2. if he has no deal apply for an extension.

step three - ask for a no-confidence motion which by this point they wil lwin as all 21 tory mps have already said if manchild comes back without a deal they will support a no-confidence motion.
having removed manchild come to an arrangement to select a new pm just to extend and call for an election.
labour has promissed that if they win they will negotiate a softer brexit and put it to the people with the other choice being remain.

if this is no plan i feel sorry for them. no plan is the brexit plan. after 3 years we still have no plan.

[cyprusgrump]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

my brexshitter friends claim the people opposing no-deal have no plans. they also show lack of understanding by claiming we are all remainers. in fact one achievement of manchild is the uniting of all those who oppose no-deal to one aim.

now here is the plan.

step one - wait till 19th of october.

step two - have a look at what manchild has done to that point. he should have done two things.
1. bring back a deal
2. if he has no deal apply for an extension.

step three - ask for a no-confidence motion which by this point they wil lwin as all 21 tory mps have already said if manchild comes back without a deal they will support a no-confidence motion.
having removed manchild come to an arrangement to select a new pm just to extend and call for an election.
labour has promissed that if they win they will negotiate a softer brexit and put it to the people with the other choice being remain.

if this is no plan i feel sorry for them. no plan is the brexit plan. after 3 years we still have no plan.

It is amazing that you Remoaners went on about Boris not having a mandate and not being democratically elected - even though the system doesn't and has never worked that way...

...but you think it would be just fine to choose a random Remoaner MP to be PM who would then have a mandate to renegotiate Brexit!

As I said before, if you didn't have double-standards you wouldn't have any at all!

[Londonrake]

anyway so it seems manchild molested a newspaper reporter or two but wait cumings's wife believes that as manchild never molested her so he could not have molested these girls.

oh well there is the proof if you ever needed any. he couldn't have done it.

can you really make a commnent about molesting a woman? are you really that far gone from humanity?

comings's wife says he could not have mplested those women because he never molested her. have you heard a better defence for a molester by a woman no less.

If the best you can come up with - without the usual repeating yourself for the umpteenth time (which is why you get no comments on some posts) - is an alleged groping from 20 years ago, then you and the pro-Remain MSM really have lost the plot.

[miltiades]

Bucket man, the word is REMAINER you moron. Learn to ...Cpell !! What a Plonker !!

[Kikapu]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

Or we could just have a GE, let the people kick out the Remoaner MPs and start again with a pro Brexit parliament...?

It is Brexit which is on “trial” and not any particular MPs. What you are saying is, that Brexit is “innocent”, therefore the case is over. On the same token, the other side could declare that Brexit is “guilty” and should be sent to the gallows.

[cyprusgrump]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

Or we could just have a GE, let the people kick out the Remoaner MPs and start again with a pro Brexit parliament...?

It is Brexit which is on “trial” and not any particular MPs. What you are saying is, that Brexit is “innocent”, therefore the case is over. On the same token, the other side could declare that Brexit is “guilty” and should be sent to the gallows.

Brexit is only 'on trial' in the bizarre imaginations of Remoaners and the Remain MP's who voted for it but would love to see it sent to 'the gallows' nd forgotten forever...

But it aint gonna happen...

[Kikapu]

Time has come to compare Brexit to the legal jargon of a “mistrial” if it were a court case, because it is at a standstill and cannot move forward with a deal/no deal deliberations. The referendum gave the go ahead with the “trial”, but there cannot be a conclusion, which means, Brexit needs to be tried again, but with a new referendum to give it the go ahead it needs, and if not, the case will remain open for the foreseeable future and the status quo continues.

Or we could just have a GE, let the people kick out the Remoaner MPs and start again with a pro Brexit parliament...?

It is Brexit which is on “trial” and not any particular MPs. What you are saying is, that Brexit is “innocent”, therefore the case is over. On the same token, the other side could declare that Brexit is “guilty” and should be sent to the gallows.

Brexit is only 'on trial' in the bizarre imaginations of Remoaners and the Remain MP's who voted for it but would love to see it sent to 'the gallows' nd forgotten forever...

But it aint gonna happen...

Well, we are heading for a "mistrial" until the case comes up again.

[Lordo]

i seem to rember that mps voted with a huge majority to activate article 50 to give th epower to the government to negotiate a deal. they did not say collaborate with the b'stards and come up with a hard as possible brexit.

and yet we see no deal in the horizon. wait a minute last minute news coming through. manchild has handed in some non-papers which are going to explain some non-borders with some non-border posts to check. as if it no matter where they put them, no matter where they are they will be given the welcome they deserve. irland will remain united, you brexit if you want to my friends but you aint taking northern ireland with you not after you signed the gfa.

can you believe this after 3 years of looking ayt alternative arrangemet, they have come up with puting border checks 5 or 10 miles in

[Lordo]

anyway so it seems manchild molested a newspaper reporter or two but wait cumings's wife believes that as manchild never molested her so he could not have molested these girls.

oh well there is the proof if you ever needed any. he couldn't have done it.

can you really make a commnent about molesting a woman? are you really that far gone from humanity?

comings's wife says he could not have mplested those women because he never molested her. have you heard a better defence for a molester by a woman no less.

If the best you can come up with - without the usual repeating yourself for the umpteenth time (which is why you get no comments on some posts) - is an alleged groping from 20 years ago, then you and the pro-Remain MSM really have lost the plot.

sorry about that old chap, i did not realise that crimes get wiped out after 20 years. have you heard of historical crimes? people have been done like a kipper 50 years later after they could prove their guilt. notice he has stopped denying it now and is claiming that people don't want to hear what molestation he did 20 years ago. like hell they don't.