The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


what next?

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: what next?

Postby B25 » Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:45 pm

Lordo wrote:
B25 wrote:Bwahahah what crock of shit. If they win an election on this manifesto the uk deserves all the sit it will get in the future. This must be a million times worst than a no deal Brexit ffs.

tsapises simmera i bodises?


Tsapiza tin mana sou je tin adelfi sou simera re Lordo, meta tous potisa me tin pippa mou.....
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: what next?

Postby cyprusgrump » Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:47 pm

Lordo wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
Lordo wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Any views on the last paragraph of the manifesto?



No more ridiculous than everything else on it... :roll:

Isn't Labour policy to negotiate a new deal and then vote against it...? :lol:

but you were ok with papadopoullos negotiating a deal and crying on the tv telling people not to vote for it.

lets take this idea of corbyn negotiating and then deciding whichway to go. what is so wrong about that. there is no doubt that he will negotiate the best deal of us to protect our jobs and and our rights and our environment. now having negotitated a deal, if the deal is not as good as remaining, what is so wrong to say, you know what we tried and staying in is a better deal, whichit is anyway.
we knew that in 2016.
there is no easy deal
there are no cards we can deal
and we will not get a better deal than being in the eu.

so in reality paying hte eu 750 million net a month and in return not paying tax on wto rules of 2,500 milion per month is a better deal than coming out and not paying 750 million and paying 2,500 million tax.

let the people decide.

what is wrong with that? why is this informed choice of votes so undemocratic.


i can hear you saying what about no deal. well there must be a way to include no deal in the ne referendum. either have two to decide deal or no deal and then which ever one wins against remain.

or have a three way vote with first and second choice with the one coming third then resdributed to the first and second according the the voters preference.

lets face it i would prefer the second referendum to be btween remain and no-deal any day.

what are you brexshitters on?



Yes indeed! :P

Lets have a GE now eh Jeremy? :lol:

Oh, you didn't mean that... you meant let the people decide between Remain and Remain, that kind of democracy...? :roll:

you mean to tell me that you don't want manchild to go to eu meeting and deliver that very easy and better than being in deal to prove us remainers wrong.
why do you insist on ge now? because you know by the time we have it we crash out. the time to ask for a general election was back in may when may resigned, not take 8 fakin weeks to decide manchild can be your pm. the consideration for that should not taken any more than 5 minutes and the conclusion would have been don't be so stupid.

we will have a ge just as sson as manchild returns from the eu meeting on the 18th of october.

you have to be patient with manchild. you have to take your time with him otherwise he may sulk and not bother to go to the meeting.

lets face it you are like a bear caught in a trap and can't get out till your hunter releases you.

roll on 18th of october. can't wait. the humiliation will be complete for the tory party and brexshitters.



Because it is a minority zombie government...

...and if Jeremy thought he had a hope in hell of winning he'd be calling for a GE sooner than you can say, "Socialism destroys economies"... :lol:

It is bizarre that in one post you say 'let the people decide' and in the very next post you refuse to let the people decide! :?

As I said before, if you Socialists didn't have double-standards you'd have none at all... :lol:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: what next?

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:50 pm

User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22287
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: what next?

Postby cyprusgrump » Sun Sep 29, 2019 6:32 pm

User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: what next?

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 29, 2019 6:39 pm

cyprusgrump wrote:



Oh you poor, pathetic little snowflake! :lol: :lol: :lol:

so you agree with people should riot right? speak your mind man, assuming you have one.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22287
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: what next?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sun Sep 29, 2019 10:08 pm

Lordo wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Any views on the last paragraph of the manifesto?



No more ridiculous than everything else on it... :roll:

Isn't Labour policy to negotiate a new deal and then vote against it...? :lol:

but you were ok with papadopoullos negotiating a deal and crying on the tv telling people not to vote for it.

lets take this idea of corbyn negotiating and then deciding whichway to go. what is so wrong about that. there is no doubt that he will negotiate the best deal of us to protect our jobs and and our rights and our environment. now having negotitated a deal, if the deal is not as good as remaining, what is so wrong to say, you know what we tried and staying in is a better deal, whichit is anyway.
we knew that in 2016.
there is no easy deal
there are no cards we can deal
and we will not get a better deal than being in the eu.

so in reality paying hte eu 750 million net a month and in return not paying tax on wto rules of 2,500 milion per month is a better deal than coming out and not paying 750 million and paying 2,500 million tax.

let the people decide.

what is wrong with that? why is this informed choice of votes so undemocratic.

i can hear you saying what about no deal. well there must be a way to include no deal in the ne referendum. either have two to decide deal or no deal and then which ever one wins against remain.

or have a three way vote with first and second choice with the one coming third then resdributed to the first and second according the the voters preference.

lets face it i would prefer the second referendum to be btween remain and no-deal any day.

what are you brexshitters on?


That’s it.
Assuming the 2016 gave the British Government the mandate to leave under any terms (deal or no deal) T. May should have left the EU the very next day her first deal was rejected. Or the very next day her 2nd deal was rejected. At the latest the very next day her 3rd deal was rejected. Bojo should have left the EU the very first day he became PM.
Nothing happened so far, therefore the British governing elite accepts the fact that they did not get a clear majority voting to leave with no deal.

Therefore if no deal is the only way to leave, the people should be called to vote for it in a new referendum. What’s keeping Bojo from doing it?
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: what next?

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 29, 2019 11:02 pm

that was the plan. they were going to leave with just executive order and then take on all the eu laws as they were. the very next day they were going to strip us of all our rights by using the henry the 7th laws which would have sidestepped parliament alltogether.

then popped gina miller in the picture who took them to court and got the court order to remind them that unless parliament passes a bill, they cannot do jack shit. this is why they are still trying to use the vague article 50 decleration to leave without the deal. that was not article 50 was for, it was to start talking about a deal.

the new benn bill commands the pm to come back with a deal or no deal and either way if it is parliaments wish to extend the date he is obliged to do it.

they are still thinking about trying to leave on default by a crash. they are now considering to rouse the public to begin rioting so they can use it to declare emergency and not have to apply for an extension and crash out. i got news for them they will not be able to do that unless they apply the emergency laws less than 7 days beofre the 31st of october. becasue if they do, they wil have to return to parliament within 7 days to ask for their permission to continue.

so all things being equal they will not be able to do that either as parliament is planning to give him till 19th of october and if he does not go to eu and delver the letter, there will be a no-confidence motion and manchild and his politically intelectual dwarfs will be reoved from power lock stock and barell. it is then that we shall head for the clearing in this nightmare.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22287
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: what next?

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 29, 2019 11:11 pm

there you have it folks. tories have declared in their conference that they are one nation conservatives. let man child explain in a couple of weeks how he will sacrifice northern ireland to remain in the backstop.


lets watch the fireworks then shall we. they will be good. i promise you as i am supplying the fireworks to them. the sky will light up like no other.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22287
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: what next?

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 29, 2019 11:42 pm

you cannot make it up. of course it is being denied. he was a horny little bastard. perhaps he needs to be eunuchised.

Downing Street has denied a claim that Boris Johnson squeezed a female journalist's thigh under the table at a private lunch.

Writing in the Sunday Times, Charlotte Edwardes said the incident happened to her at the offices of the Spectator magazine in 1999.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49873301
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22287
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: what next?

Postby Londonrake » Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:28 am

There’s been a “get Boris” campaign running for months now. As we approach Oct 31st it’s becoming increasingly hysterical. In this episode, allegedly squeezing some woman’s thigh - 20 years ago. Desperate and pathetic. :roll:
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests