Paphitis wrote:Australia is in no squeeze at all.
https://www.google.com.cy/search?source ... 0kkiTGKJQI
Paphitis wrote:Australia is in no squeeze at all.
erolz66 wrote:Paphitis wrote:Australia is in no squeeze at all.
https://www.google.com.cy/search?source ... 0kkiTGKJQI
Pyrpolizer wrote:Btw Paphitis, credit due to our friend Robin Hood (btw where is he- Milti do you know anything is he in good health??) we learned that
the days when the central Banks were just printing money to fight recession are over.
The paper money circulating in any market today is less than 4(?) percent.
So if a certain Country within the Eurozone wants to fight recession, then the local authorities must do more spending and offer more loans.
This is exactly what Italy did, and instead of recovering it got worse reaching a very high Government Debt.
This proves that Italy's problems are totally irrelevant to the currency.
Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:Adoption of the Euro has proven disastrous for the Italians. You can’t hide that fact in obfuscating bullshit.
Yeah right, prove it! I am sorry you are so confused that anything other than a straight line is obfuscating to you.
Just tell me, do you think the Italians are stupid? What's keeping them from abandoning the Euro and reverting to their old Italian Lira if in fact their demise was because of the Euro?
The proof is in the pudding. And it couldn't be more obvious even if it hit you across the face. The EU had a disastrous financial crisis. You felt it more than any. Every day for about 4 years the EU was in the global headlines as the crisis deepened and threatened the existence of the Eurozone itself.
EU member states such as Italy, Spain, Ireland, Portugal, and in particular Cyprus and Greece had an unprecedented collapse of their GDP which was largely unseen outside.
Comparing this of course to Malta (who fared well) is extremely disingenuous, because this small country could easily shield itself with good financial management and restraint by balancing their current accounts.
Comparing it to Germany that virtually kept growing the entire time is also disingenuous because the Euro is virtually the DM and the ECB is protecting the Big EU States like Germany at the expense of Southern Europe who had to eat shit for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Once again:
the eurozone consists of 19 countries: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain. From all those 19 only 5 had problems and from those 5 Greece and Cyprus problems WERE NOT BECAUSE of the Euro but for other reasons.
Assuming your claim that the Euro is destined to destroy economies like Italy's Spain's and Portugal's then what's keeping them from going back to their ex-national currency.
You too must answer the question if you think the Italians, the Spanish and the Portuguese are stupid for not doing so.
Not all countries will collapse.
But all countries that did collapse or have a near collapse happen to be EU. It was the Eurozone in the news every single day.
That's your proof.
Pyrpolizer wrote:
You didn't answer my question. Do you think the Italians, the Spanish and the Portuguese are stupid for not abandoning the Euro and reverting to their old currencies?
Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Btw Paphitis, credit due to our friend Robin Hood (btw where is he- Milti do you know anything is he in good health??) we learned that
the days when the central Banks were just printing money to fight recession are over.
The paper money circulating in any market today is less than 4(?) percent.
So if a certain Country within the Eurozone wants to fight recession, then the local authorities must do more spending and offer more loans.
This is exactly what Italy did, and instead of recovering it got worse reaching a very high Government Debt.
This proves that Italy's problems are totally irrelevant to the currency.
I wouldn't listen to him.
The Banking system is fractional yes. But 4%, I am not so sure that is correct.
But in any case, I don't know what he is up to. He was and is no fan of the EU.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Btw Paphitis, credit due to our friend Robin Hood (btw where is he- Milti do you know anything is he in good health??) we learned that
the days when the central Banks were just printing money to fight recession are over.
The paper money circulating in any market today is less than 4(?) percent.
So if a certain Country within the Eurozone wants to fight recession, then the local authorities must do more spending and offer more loans.
This is exactly what Italy did, and instead of recovering it got worse reaching a very high Government Debt.
This proves that Italy's problems are totally irrelevant to the currency.
I wouldn't listen to him.
The Banking system is fractional yes. But 4%, I am not so sure that is correct.
But in any case, I don't know what he is up to. He was and is no fan of the EU.
You didn't have to listen to him. Listen to me:
Do you disagree that the days of the central Bank printing paper money to fight recession are over once and for all regardless of the country or the currency it uses?
Do you disagree that the current practice of fighting recession (in an otherwise healthy economy) depends entirely on the local Governments?
NB. Exception to the rule is of course the petrodollar country of USA.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Btw Paphitis, credit due to our friend Robin Hood (btw where is he- Milti do you know anything is he in good health??) we learned that
the days when the central Banks were just printing money to fight recession are over.
The paper money circulating in any market today is less than 4(?) percent.
So if a certain Country within the Eurozone wants to fight recession, then the local authorities must do more spending and offer more loans.
This is exactly what Italy did, and instead of recovering it got worse reaching a very high Government Debt.
This proves that Italy's problems are totally irrelevant to the currency.
I wouldn't listen to him.
The Banking system is fractional yes. But 4%, I am not so sure that is correct.
But in any case, I don't know what he is up to. He was and is no fan of the EU.
You didn't have to listen to him. Listen to me:
Do you disagree that the days of the central Bank printing paper money to fight recession are over once and for all regardless of the country or the currency it uses?
Do you disagree that the current practice of fighting recession (in an otherwise healthy economy) depends entirely on the local Governments?
NB. Exception to the rule is of course the petrodollar country of USA.
The European Central Bank (ECB) will cut its deposit rate next week and announce a restart of quantitative easing (bond purchases) program from October, according to the latest Reuters poll of nearly 70 economists conducted between Aug. 29-Sept. 3.
Key points (Source: Reuters)
Nearly 90% of respondents expected the ECB to announce the restarting of its money printing presses, with monthly purchases of €30 billion from October.
Almost 90% of respondents said the ECB would introduce some form of compensation for banks to offset the unwelcome side-effects of negative interest rates.
Nearly 70 economists were expecting the ECB to cut its deposit rate at its Sept. 12 meeting, with the vast majority predicting a 10 basis point reduction to -0.5%.
Note that the Eurozone money markets are now pricing a 60% chance of a 20 basis point cut in the deposit rate from the current minus 0.4%.
Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:
You didn't answer my question. Do you think the Italians, the Spanish and the Portuguese are stupid for not abandoning the Euro and reverting to their old currencies?
It's very early days for that.
No I do not think they are stupid.
Every attempt by ANYONE to leave the EU has been undermined and interfrered with by the EU - Irish and Dutch referendums. Now all eyes on the UK.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests