Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

Priti Patel tells it the way it is. Priti destroys Corbynated Chicken and Abbotpotamus!

[Londonrake]

you actually believe that the he was in any danger? pigs will fly.

You've no idea - as is often the case - what you're talking about.

I'm no lover of Randy Andy. However, in May/June 1982 he was on a RN carrier 8000 miles from the UK and 900 from Argentina. Within striking distance of their mainland based and certainly, had it got to play a part, carrier borne, (Veinticinco de Mayo) aircraft. The same aircraft that destroyed HMS Sheffield, Ardent, Antelope, Coventry the SS Atlantic Conveyor and RFA Sir Galahad.

Frankly though, I don't really give a "fakin" rat's arse what you think on the matter.

[Kikapu]

fancy the prince claiming he was at pizza express at 4 o’clock in the afternoon in woking and hence could not be also at a club in london later on in the evening.

also he cannot say if the hand on the girl was his.

and finally he could not have been dancing and sweating because at the time he was suffering from a medical condition of overdosing on adrenalin because he was shot in war. i did not realise the argentinians had landed on ascension islands.

if he gets asked t go to court and if his lawyer advises that he should he wil lattend court. very nice too..


i'll ave some of that.

Since age of consent is 16 years old in the UK, why is Andrew lying boinking her? She is such a good looker, he should smile ear to ear as he admits it.

When it comes to, “he said/she said”, there needs to be some very collaborative evidence to see who is telling the truth, but when one party says “it happened” and the other party say “I don’t remember”, then the believable party has to be the one who remembers it. I remember every woman I had sex with in the last 40+ years (no, not because there was only one woman ) even if I don’t remember their names. So right there, Andrew is in a pickle by claiming he does not remember her or boinking her.

How can any man not remember boinking that 17 year old beauty? Who would blame him? Now, as for the part about her being forced to have sex with Andrew, that would bring us back to who has collaborative evidence to back their statement. She could take a lie detector test, but would not be allowed as evidence in the court of law, but it will have huge affect against Andrew in public opinion if she told the truth.

Personally, I believe Andrew boinked her, lucky dog, just like any other hot blooded man would have done. If he forced her to have sex with him, then he raped her and should pay the price. Saying he does not remember is like saying he boinked her.

[Londonrake]

I agree. Why do the royals take part in this sort of interview? Can you think of one (Charles/Diane/Fergi/William/Harry) which made things better?

I said it before but just to add a bit of weight. I absolutely couldn't give a monkey's about what Andrew got up to. I worked in the same room with him once in flight planning at RAF Kinloss up in Scotland. From the way he conducted himself and talked to those around him I formed the opinion that he was a pretentious prat.

Nevertheless and FWIW, Lordo's vilification regarding the Falklands was wrong. The man wasn't a hero and I'm thinking WTF was the being"Shot at" about. It's total bollocks. Nevertheless, he was on Invincible during the conflict and did his share of chopper sorties.

End of (I hope)

[MR-from-NG]

fancy the prince claiming he was at pizza express at 4 o’clock in the afternoon in woking and hence could not be also at a club in london later on in the evening.

also he cannot say if the hand on the girl was his.

and finally he could not have been dancing and sweating because at the time he was suffering from a medical condition of overdosing on adrenalin because he was shot in war. i did not realise the argentinians had landed on ascension islands.

if he gets asked t go to court and if his lawyer advises that he should he wil lattend court. very nice too..


i'll ave some of that.

Since age of consent is 16 years old in the UK, why is Andrew lying boinking her? She is such a good looker, he should smile ear to ear as he admits it.

When it comes to, “he said/she said”, there needs to be some very collaborative evidence to see who is telling the truth, but when one party says “it happened” and the other party say “I don’t remember”, then the believable party has to be the one who remembers it. I remember every woman I had sex with in the last 40+ years (no, not because there was only one woman ) even if I don’t remember their names. So right there, Andrew is in a pickle by claiming he does not remember her or boinking her.

How can any man not remember boinking that 17 year old beauty? Who would blame him? Now, as for the part about her being forced to have sex with Andrew, that would bring us back to who has collaborative evidence to back their statement. She could take a lie detector test, but would not be allowed as evidence in the court of law, but it will have huge affect against Andrew in public opinion if she told the truth.

Personally, I believe Andrew boinked her, lucky dog, just like any other hot blooded man would have done. If he forced her to have sex with him, then he raped her and should pay the price. Saying he does not remember is like saying he boinked her.

You lucky bastard. I only remember my countless visits to Guys Hospital and a clinic in Charlotte Street near Goode Street station. Prince Andrew is insulting the nations intelligence so I'm nominating him as the cunt of the week

[Kikapu]

fancy the prince claiming he was at pizza express at 4 o’clock in the afternoon in woking and hence could not be also at a club in london later on in the evening.

also he cannot say if the hand on the girl was his.

and finally he could not have been dancing and sweating because at the time he was suffering from a medical condition of overdosing on adrenalin because he was shot in war. i did not realise the argentinians had landed on ascension islands.

if he gets asked t go to court and if his lawyer advises that he should he wil lattend court. very nice too..


i'll ave some of that.

Since age of consent is 16 years old in the UK, why is Andrew lying boinking her? She is such a good looker, he should smile ear to ear as he admits it.

When it comes to, “he said/she said”, there needs to be some very collaborative evidence to see who is telling the truth, but when one party says “it happened” and the other party say “I don’t remember”, then the believable party has to be the one who remembers it. I remember every woman I had sex with in the last 40+ years (no, not because there was only one woman ) even if I don’t remember their names. So right there, Andrew is in a pickle by claiming he does not remember her or boinking her.

How can any man not remember boinking that 17 year old beauty? Who would blame him? Now, as for the part about her being forced to have sex with Andrew, that would bring us back to who has collaborative evidence to back their statement. She could take a lie detector test, but would not be allowed as evidence in the court of law, but it will have huge affect against Andrew in public opinion if she told the truth.

Personally, I believe Andrew boinked her, lucky dog, just like any other hot blooded man would have done. If he forced her to have sex with him, then he raped her and should pay the price. Saying he does not remember is like saying he boinked her.

You lucky bastard. I only remember my countless visits to Guys Hospital and a clinic in Charlotte Street near Goode Street station. Prince Andrew is insulting the nations intelligence so I'm nominating him as the cunt of the week

Andrew is not only cunt of the week, but he boinked the cunt of the century!

[Lordo]

fancy the prince claiming he was at pizza express at 4 o’clock in the afternoon in woking and hence could not be also at a club in london later on in the evening.

also he cannot say if the hand on the girl was his.

and finally he could not have been dancing and sweating because at the time he was suffering from a medical condition of overdosing on adrenalin because he was shot in war. i did not realise the argentinians had landed on ascension islands.

if he gets asked t go to court and if his lawyer advises that he should he wil lattend court. very nice too..


i'll ave some of that.

Since age of consent is 16 years old in the UK, why is Andrew lying boinking her? She is such a good looker, he should smile ear to ear as he admits it.

When it comes to, “he said/she said”, there needs to be some very collaborative evidence to see who is telling the truth, but when one party says “it happened” and the other party say “I don’t remember”, then the believable party has to be the one who remembers it. I remember every woman I had sex with in the last 40+ years (no, not because there was only one woman ) even if I don’t remember their names. So right there, Andrew is in a pickle by claiming he does not remember her or boinking her.

How can any man not remember boinking that 17 year old beauty? Who would blame him? Now, as for the part about her being forced to have sex with Andrew, that would bring us back to who has collaborative evidence to back their statement. She could take a lie detector test, but would not be allowed as evidence in the court of law, but it will have huge affect against Andrew in public opinion if she told the truth.

Personally, I believe Andrew boinked her, lucky dog, just like any other hot blooded man would have done. If he forced her to have sex with him, then he raped her and should pay the price. Saying he does not remember is like saying he boinked her.

this is because this was no ordinary boinking as you called it. she was supplied by somebody else and not out of her choice. she may not have refused but only because she had no choice. she had a pimp and this pimp supplied other girls to him too and others.

of course he was also getting lessons on how to evade tax too. so you can see how prostitution and tax evasion is on the same level in some countries clearly legal too

[Kikapu]

fancy the prince claiming he was at pizza express at 4 o’clock in the afternoon in woking and hence could not be also at a club in london later on in the evening.

also he cannot say if the hand on the girl was his.

and finally he could not have been dancing and sweating because at the time he was suffering from a medical condition of overdosing on adrenalin because he was shot in war. i did not realise the argentinians had landed on ascension islands.

if he gets asked t go to court and if his lawyer advises that he should he wil lattend court. very nice too..


i'll ave some of that.

Since age of consent is 16 years old in the UK, why is Andrew lying boinking her? She is such a good looker, he should smile ear to ear as he admits it.

When it comes to, “he said/she said”, there needs to be some very collaborative evidence to see who is telling the truth, but when one party says “it happened” and the other party say “I don’t remember”, then the believable party has to be the one who remembers it. I remember every woman I had sex with in the last 40+ years (no, not because there was only one woman ) even if I don’t remember their names. So right there, Andrew is in a pickle by claiming he does not remember her or boinking her.

How can any man not remember boinking that 17 year old beauty? Who would blame him? Now, as for the part about her being forced to have sex with Andrew, that would bring us back to who has collaborative evidence to back their statement. She could take a lie detector test, but would not be allowed as evidence in the court of law, but it will have huge affect against Andrew in public opinion if she told the truth.

Personally, I believe Andrew boinked her, lucky dog, just like any other hot blooded man would have done. If he forced her to have sex with him, then he raped her and should pay the price. Saying he does not remember is like saying he boinked her.

this is because this was no ordinary boinking as you called it. she was supplied by somebody else and not out of her choice. she may not have refused but only because she had no choice. she had a pimp and this pimp supplied other girls to him too and others.

of course he was also getting lessons on how to evade tax too. so you can see how prostitution and tax evasion is on the same level in some countries clearly legal too

Was she kept as a sex slave against her own free will to be passed around for sex or did she enjoy being around high rollers who expected sex from her? I mean, she looks like she is very comfortable with Andrew having his arm around her waist and his pot belly pushing against her.

[Lordo]

he was found guilty of sex trafficking of minors. the asshole carried on meeting epstein after he came out of prison.

[Paphitis]

he was found guilty of sex trafficking of minors. the asshole carried on meeting epstein after he came out of prison.

Totally no fan of Andrew in the slightest and the fact he met Epstein afterwards is a factor that contributes to this as well.

But ethics aside. Was it moral what Andrew did? Not in my book. I don't rate the man.

Was it illegal? probably not illegal. So the worst thing that can happen to Andrew is a bit of embarrassment and egg on his face.

But I always said, if you hang with Turkey you become one.

Nevertheless, Andrew did not traffic any women. He, as far as we can tell, is not accused of having sex with women under the legal age and without their consent. He did not rape.

So, he may be one very lucky dude, because sleeping with trafficked girls under the legal age is just hideous.