Which is the process. I am asking which is part of the process of trying to understand what you are saying. Why you think this is funny I am not sure ?
Do you support public schools being classed as charities or not ? You seem to accept that if such was removed from them that alone would not cause them to stop existing. Would not cause burden on the treasury as the kids going there end up going to state schools instead. Or have I misunderstood that ? So what is your view on them having CHARITY status ? That is what I am trying to understand. What YOUR opinion is on that.
Londonrake wrote:The top “elite” schools will continue. Period. Unless banned, as a result of socialist political dogma. So, you won’t be rid of the Boris Johnson’s of this world. Just deny people like yourself and young Jimmy Bloggs the option.
Who said ending charity status of such schools would rid us of the Jonhsons of this world ? What it would do is save the treasury millions of pounds.
Londonrake wrote:I love it when people who’ve been fortunate enough to benefit from something subsequently develop a puritan-like social conscience and decide others should be denied, because it’s unfair. Hypocrisy. Just like Ms Abbott, IIRC.
I was not fortunate enough to benefit from a public school education. I was fortunate enough to have survived such without too much damage. I support the removal of charity status from such schools because such is inherently and fundamentally unfair in social terms. I support the integration of such schools in to the state system because I do not think
any child needs to be put at risk of of suffering the kind of emotional damage and scarring that I believe such a system makes statistically more likely than the state school system does.