Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lordo]

here is another development in the middle east. the huothies have attacked two of the largest oil installations in suadi arabia.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-49699429


what next. how will saudi arabia or any other country protect their vital installations from the individuals who are not happy with what the west and her cronies are doing and decide to attack their vital installations using drones which are easily aquired and just as easily armed.

[Lordo]

now that kamaroon has surfaced out of the woodwork perhaps we can explain to him what was wrong with the referendum in 2016.

first thing that was wrong was the purpose of the referendum. he was briccking it with the ukip taking votes from the tory party which meant that they may not win another election in 10 years but worse the tory party may split into two different parties. in fact he not only deepened the split in his own party but he aslo destroyed the country along the lines of his party's split.

secondly he did not carry out a proper analysys of different remain possibilites and their consequences on our rights and economy and compare them with remain before anouncing the referendum. this would have taken about a year and would have informed the country as to the choices and their consequences.

thirdly he allowed the brexshitters to lie their way into the ballotboz, promissing thinhs they knew very well they could not have. i mean only a stupid idiots likes of bafidi would believe that when we leave we would get a better deal than when we were in.

do you understand the above? or shall i repost in griikish or terggish.

[Lordo]

they developed these drones attacks and now they are going to be attacked with the same things. what a world we live in.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-middle-east-49699489

[Lordo]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-middle-east-42557858

[Lordo]

i see thegc fascists are up to their usual tricks. he should be identified and handed over to the north to be prosecuted for his crimes. what is it with the gcs fascination with the terggish flag, surely they have enough flaggs of their own right?


https://cyprus-mail.com/2019/09/14/efforts-underway-to-ease-tension-after-flag-removal/

[Lordo]

this is very interesting and frightening

https://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow/videos/2441646116063824/

[Lordo]

in case you are interested the attack on suadi arabia by 10 yemeni drones has halved the oil sales of saudi arabia. does it mean with another 10 drones they can knock out the rest?

watch the petrol price shhot up next week. i better fill the car.

[repulsewarrior]

...what kind of drone: American, Israeli, Turkish?

...people will ask if the price of oil goes up.

[Lordo]

...what kind of drone: American, Israeli, Turkish?

...people will ask if the price of oil goes up.

more importantly the question that is going to ask is how undefended are?
if we spend bilions on arms, how are we so valnurable.

where the drones came from is not that difficult.
you can buy them over the internetand with a bit of knowhow you can convert commercial drones into military weapons.

[Lordo]

another question is the scottish court's ruling that prorogation was unlawful. and of course everybody jumps on the bandwagon from blaming the mps for everything to the judges in scotland being biassed. if you want to find ut you will find the truth.
here is a lawyer explaining the scottish decision.

Legal expert David Allen Green explained to James O'Brien why the government lost their court case on prorogation - and the reason why it happened is very revealing.
Three Scottish judges ruled that the suspending of parliament was unlawful and it all boiled down to the government not submitting a witness statement explaining their reasoning.
And speaking to LBC, Mr Green explained that the lack of that document is at the centre of the entire case.

He said: "The government has shown it can't even abuse the constitution competently. The whole exercise is an illustration of their ineptness over Brexit.
"The idea was to suspend parliament - to actually lock the doors and stop everything for five weeks with this ancient power. It's only meant to be for a few days.
"But someone had the bright idea to close parliament down for five weeks to stop MPs doing anything in this national crisis.
"On the face of it, they had a legal power to do it and my initial view was that there was zero chance of this being legally challenged. But it was litigated and the argument was that the government was that they were acting in bad faith.
"Usually, when you are faced as a government with a legal challenge of bad faith, all you really need to do is put down a witness statement from a minister or a senior civil servant just explaining how the decision was made. And that is what should have happened.

"But for some reason, a witness statement was not put in in this Scottish case. That has turned out to be crucial.
"In the absence of an account by the government of why they took this decision to prorogue parliament - and remember that the official version is that it is to prepare for a new Queen's Speech - it became open to the Scottish judges to infer that in the absence of a positive plausible explanation, that there was a bad motive, that it was being done to stop parliamentary scrutiny.
"Having found that, they've made what's called a declaration. Unanimously, the three Scottish judges have said that the only explanation for this prorogation is improper motive. And if it's improper motive, then it's unlawful.”

So why wasn't a witness statement submitted by the government? That's where things get even more interesting.

He continued: "The reason there wasn't a witness statement is because it seems that nobody would risk the legal peril of signing it.
"It's a criminal offence to knowingly [mislead a court].
"it would appear that there was something which prevented somebody happily signing a witness statement explaining the true reason why prorogation was sought.
"In the absence of that, it was conspicuous.

"Why can't the government get any minister or civil servant to sign a witness statement under peril of law stating that the true reason they wanted prorogation was the prepare for a Queen's speech? They can't find anybody to do that."
Finishing where he started, David said: "This was an exercise in choreography. This could have been done competently. But they couldn't even do this competently.
"In the run-up to it, they should have made sure that nobody sent stupid texts and messages giving the true reasons."

now you tell me you have not learned anything new today.