Londonrake wrote:I’ve said, I think on several occasions, there really isn’t anything to debate or “engage” about. The fundamentals are quite simple and if beyond your (and similar others) capacity to accept then what’s there to discuss? I post because I like sticking a pin in what I regard as pompous outpourings here. Some even from people who have virtually no connection to the UK. What I don’t do is substitute this for reality. Spending hour upon hour in here every day.
The pro active Brexit post of yours that prompted my first or maybe 2nd Brexit post since 2016 was a Guido article about Bercow. Nothing fundamental there at all. Just partisan propaganda from the most biased of sources about a 'detail'. I stuck a pin in the blatant inaccuracies, as I saw them, in the article you posted and you then declared ' do not want to talk about it'. To use your own 'tactics', it might well make you feel better to believe that you 'stick to the fundamentals' but the evidence speaks otherwise I suggest.
Londonrake wrote:FWIW, after reading all this stuff for quite a long time, it strikes me that a couple of our “Democrats” probably suffer from personality disorders which impact upon their daily lives. It’s not unusual to find this on forums, which act as a form of compensating mechanism, giving them an element of relief from trials suffered in the real world. Fascinating stuff actually.
Again just classic ad homiem attacks is all I see. You theory would seem to be, you are normal, anyone who disagrees with you is suffering from personality disorder but those who actually display the most symptoms of personality disorder (and have little to no connection to the UK to boot) but happen to agree with you are never worthy of any mention.