Paphitis wrote:You are affected no more than fluctuations in Australia's currency which is linked to commodity prices.
I am unaffected by movements in the value of Australia's currency relative to others because I have no AUD income, no AUD deposits and no AUD denominated assets.
Paphitis wrote:You will take the highs and the lows as they come like everyone else.
I will indeed have to live with the highs and lows of the value of Sterling and the point is , to date the effect of the referendum result is that it has all been lows with that looking to increasingly be the cased going forward. Now Mogg has suggested that we will not see the economic benefits of Brexit until 2050. Well that will be too late for me.
Paphitis wrote:You are not in a position to claim adverse conditions to subvert and undermine a democratic mandate delivered by the people about Britain's future which in time will see many ups and downs like every other country on the planet and which in due course will have a number of Free Trade deals with so many countries, that its EU non membership will be a non issue like it isn't an issue for Norway, Switzerland, Australia, canada and USA which also have Free Trade Deals.
I made no such claim. I have never said the democratic will of the people as to IF we should leave or HOW we should leave should be ignored if that will affects me personally in a negative way. You are the one arguing that the people should only have a say in IF we exit the EU but not in HOW we do so. Who is the democrat here and who is the ideologue seeking to get their maximum desire by denying the people a right to a say (directly or indirectly and indirectly we have already HAD our say once on no deal as a way of exiting) in HOW we leave the EU.