Londonrake wrote:Erolz.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
If I have slandered you then sue me. I will happily provide you any and all details you might need to pursue such a case.
Londonrake wrote:Thanks for your analysis of me.
You are welcome. Just as I am welcome to your assertions as to what my motivations are and what I must know to be true etc etc.
Londonrake wrote:Another book. You really ought to get your posts down to a manageable level, if you want people to read them.
Yeah I think someone said that to Darwin when he wrote 'Origin of Species' (not that I am in ANY way comparing my posts to his wirtings other than in terms of length)
Londonrake wrote:I’m disappointed TBH.
You appear to have confused me with someone who gives a toss as to if you are disappointed or not. I have no agenda here of trying to 'not disappoint' others, win them over, convince them of anything or be their friends. My agenda is entirely selfish in terms of trying to understand better. I care not if in doing that I upset you or inspire you, it is simply irrelevant to me and why I am here either way.
Londonrake wrote:I meant CG of course - I thought you might have managed to figure that one out.
I did consider that but given that you seem to be on the same side as CG on these issues I was not sure. Thanks for the clarification.