erolz66 wrote:
Do you seriously believe this argument ?
Lets say I spend £85 a week on shopping at Tesco's. Your argument goes along the lines of that £85 per week = £4,4200 per year = £44,200 per 10 years or £132,600 by 2050, so therefore if I stop shopping at Tesco's till 2050 I will be 'economically advantaged' to the tune of £132,600 by 2050. Can you really not see the 'flaw' in such an argument ? Or is it that you have no interest in if the argument is sound or not, only if you think it can influence people the way you want, regardless of the flaws in it ?
Nice try...
So your argument is all the money we send to the EU is for stuff we would buy anyway...?
Why don't we just buy it ourselves then and cut out the middle man? That is what we are going to do when we leave...
And BTW, if the cash we (and the other nett contributors) give to the EU is for stuff we want, where does the EU get the money to splash about like a drunken sailor on shore leave?
I mean seriously, do you think the average working man in the UK with a mortgage and bills to pay is happy that a large amount of the tax he is forced to pay is spunked away by the EU?
Yeah, I know that you have to put food on the table and the kids need new shoes and electricity and fuel are more expensive because of EU regulations but hey, we need your money more because we need to refurbish a market in the 'occupied areas' of Cyprus! No thanks, we'll take Brexit...