cyprusgrump wrote:Look, we completely understand your position on all this!
You want to change all the unfortunate rules that don’t suit your position of staying in the EU right?
No not at all. My objective here, in the face of
your repeated attempts to try and show to yourself and others that you want to leave the EU because of 'logical reasons', is to provide actual evidence, logically consistent evidence, that despite what you want to believe and want others to believe is the 'source' of your desire to leave the EU, it is in fact more based in 'faith' than 'reason'.
cyprusgrump wrote:So, changing the way party leaders are chosen, re-run the referendum, no confidence votes, you name it and we get it, we understand. We’ve seen enough of it over the past three years to know that Remainers will do anything to avoid the Brexit that the public voted for.
I will not generalise on 'leavers' or 'remainers' in the way you do. Such serves no useful purpose and neither does it reflect any objective reality imo. I will say that imo YOU are providing ample evidence that YOU will say anything, do anything. to try and convince yourself and others that your desire to leave is rooted in 'reason' when in reality it is not it is rooted in 'faith'.
cyprusgrump wrote:But please! Don’t in parallel bang on about democratic deficiency because it is clear that Remainers have no interest in democracy whatsoever.
Mate YOU are the one who first started banging on about 'democratic deficiency' and tried to use it as a 'reason' why you support leaving the EU and then when faced with the reality that such deficiency are not unique to the EU, exist in all democratic system of governance to one degree or another, simply retreat in to denial and insults and in the process add weight to my suggestion that your desire to leave the EU is not in fact rooted in 'reason' but is rooted in 'faith'. Which of course you do not like.
(by the way the public did not vote for a no deal exit from the EU. All the evidence suggest there is no democratic mandate for such an exit, even though we did vote to exit and the only way to show there is such a mandate for such an exit would be to ask that question directly via a referendum, something that you demand is 'unacceptable' and almost certainly your demand that such is unacceptable is linked to the you knowing that there is no such mandate for such an exit and never has been)