if the TRNC unilatrally declares tomorrow that it will allow GCs to return to their properies, provided they accept the soveregnity and recgonzie the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, this will be the final blow to the RoC. Recognition will be just a matter of time.
I'd have to see it to believe it. But remember it is not simply the fact that the TRNC currently prevents GCs from enjoying their homes that cause the international community grief, it is the means by which partition is enforced as well as attempts to change the demography of the isand.
The official language of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus will be Turkish. I do not believe a change in the name would be necessary, for example Greece is not exclusively greek, it also belongs to the turkish minority there, so is Bulgaria. The TRNC will not be exclusively turkish either, it will belong to all of its residents. Safeguard mechanisms that will esnure the protection of minorities should be introduced for the full satisfaction of the TRNC citizens of greek origin.
I'm afraid I have to disagree here. Turkey as a country already exists, to call something 'Turkish' either indicates a link to the country or to the ethnicity of its citizens. The republic of Northern Cyprus would be a much more politically correct name for such a nation given the sheer number of citizens who would not consider themselves of Turkish ethnicity.
I also must disagree with the official language only being Turkish. Turkish can be the dominant language but Greek must also be official under such circumstances.
The population of the TRNC today is 232 thousand*, the total number of greek cypriot refugees is around 180 thousand, not all of which will return because the properties of some will be exchanged for turkish properties in the south, say swapping for around 50 000 TCs who left the South, the maximum number of GCS that will be eligible to return will be around 130-140 thousand. Clarly GCs will not be a majority of the TRNC and will constitute around a 1/3 of the total population.
Apologies, my earlier argument was not based on numbers but land ownership. My assumption being that the land ownership would be roughly proportional to the population. I believe this assumption should hold on the most part given the string correlation between land ownership and population (as you'd expect).
You must realise though, that the figures for population of the TRNC almost certainly include a number of settlers over and above normal rates of immigration. This is hardly surprising given the amount of land available in the North after partition in 1974.
Despite all this, if the TRNC allows all the settlers to stay then you are correct, the GCs would be 135/(232+135) = 37% of the population (let's call it a third for the sake of argument).
In addition, according to your figures 1/3 of the population would therefore own around 1368/2481 = 55% of the privately owned land.
That seems like a big imbalance to me, perhaps one likely to cause resent, especially amongst settlers who have been given land and now have that taken away. Also see that the population of the TRNC rises from 232 thousand to 367 thousand, quite an increase.
Of course this is all hypothetical. Sorry to sound so negative, but this kind of 'let's recognise partition as it stands, allow refugees restitution and walk away' solution is simply too unrealistic and would never be agreed upon by the majority of Cypriots. Partition just doesn't work for Cyprus without causing huge suffering to many Cypriots, this is why it was never seriously considerd by say the British back in the 1950s.