Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lordo]

That Jew Bercow said NO. Anyone knows why?

it really is abouve your league reh bedroshillara

uk has no constitution but they do have a system of decision making going back hundreds of years.

the speaker cannot say yes toany law that will be used for change so he backs the no. not his preference just the convention used in the uk for hundreds of years. no you can go back to jew and hate and an occasional terggish hate too.


when's you going to save stanbuli boy?

[kurupetos]

That Jew Bercow said NO. Anyone knows why?

That orthodox christian kurupetos seems obsessed with people's Jewish ancestry. Anyone know why ?

I know why.

[Londonrake]

I think the man is much wrongly maligned and strives hard to maintain a neutral stance. As seen here:

https://order-order.com/2019/04/01/berc ... votes-yet/

.

[kurupetos]

That Jew Bercow said NO. Anyone knows why?

That orthodox christian kurupetos seems obsessed with people's Jewish ancestry. Anyone know why ?

yep

he has only two brain cells left. one is filled with the word jew and the other hate. the terggish hatred hovers around in his head playing musical chairs waiting to get a seat.

I love you kuz!

...but next time answer the f* question... or simply bugger off!

[kurupetos]

I think the man is much wrongly maligned and strives hard to maintain a neutral stance. As seen here:

https://order-order.com/2019/04/01/berc ... votes-yet/

.

Finally a meaningful answer... cheers mate.

[Londonrake]

Finally a meaningful answer... cheers mate.

Meaningful answer? Are you trying to ruin my reputation??

[miltiades]

The PM , that stupid bloody woman, has now requested referral of Brexshit to the end of June .By which time there will be general election, perhaps we might get the fucking Clown as PM who in turn will appoint the Arsehole Farage as our ...foreign secretary? He will find him a safe seat !! What a bloody circus. Well at least we ....have our country back and a cash rich NHS. its not over yet, another referendum is on the horizon.

[erolz66]

I think the man is much wrongly maligned and strives hard to maintain a neutral stance. As seen here:

https://order-order.com/2019/04/01/berc ... votes-yet/

.

?

There were four options put forward by MP's that Bercow did not select.

A) Unilateral right of exit from backstop - I guess you could call this a 'leaver' option but really even if it could get a majority in the house in support of it, it still does not do anything in finding a way out of the deadlock (the point of the indicative vote process). To my mind you might just as well put up a motion 'The EU will pay US 39 billion to leave.' Might well get majority support if the speaker put it forward to be voted on but to what point ? So really you think Bercow did not select this option because of a motivation to 'stitch up' Brexit ? There is no way to imagine he did not put it forward because the motion itself was pointless in the context of trying to find a way forward that could command majority support ?

B) No deal in the absence of a Withdrawal Agreement - In the first round of indicative votes essentially the same motion was defeated by 400 votes against vs 160 for. So again evidence of a Brecow stitch up or just common sense that there was little point it putting it forward again ?

The other 2 options Bercow did not select were 'remainer' options.

Is it in the realms of possibility that Brecow is abusing his position as speaker to 'stitch up' Brexit. Yes it is. Is the options he did and did not choose to put forward in the 2nd round of the indicative vote process evidence of him abusing his power to stitch up Brexit ? I would say it could only be evidence of such to people with such an entrenched position that they really do not care what reality is.

[Londonrake]

I'm not going to play your game and argue with you E. I've learned over the past 33 months that it's a pointless exercise. Whatever the outcome of the current parliamentary pantomime the fundamentals are insurmountable. The Brexit Genie's out of the bottle and - regardless of any intermediate obstacles - it's never, ever going back in.

[erolz66]

I'm not going to play your game and argue with you E. I've learned over the past 33 months that it's a pointless exercise. Whatever the outcome of the current parliamentary pantomime the fundamentals are insurmountable. The Brexit Genie's out of the bottle and - regardless of any intermediate obstacles - it's never, ever going back in.

What game ? You put up a 'proposition' that the motions Bercow selected from the 8 proposed was evidence of his bias. I think the proposition does not stand up to impartial enquiry and said so. Personally, after all that happened, I care little for what the UK's status and relationship with the EU ends up being. Certainly no where near as much as I care about the way the UK is tearing itself apart over it or the global global trend, of the sustained assault on and death of both 'reason' and 'reasonableness'.