Londonrake wrote:Mayday - imminent threat to life. Pan - urgent situation?
I had a couple of Pan calls. Pull up a sandbag ........
I had few, the Pan, the Pan, the fucking Pan is burning call-out in the kitchen whenever the wife would cook.
Londonrake wrote:Mayday - imminent threat to life. Pan - urgent situation?
I had a couple of Pan calls. Pull up a sandbag ........
Kikapu wrote:Londonrake wrote:Mayday - imminent threat to life. Pan - urgent situation?
I had a couple of Pan calls. Pull up a sandbag ........
I had few, the Pan, the Pan, the fucking Pan is burning call-out in the kitchen whenever the wife would cook.
Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:
Then we conduct a Mayday or Pan pan call. I always opt for the pan pan as the plane never seems to fall out of the sky when I get these in the sim. United went for Mayday. Fair call there. The distinction is you are declaring an urgent emergency that is extremely urgent and requires activation of all emergency services as opposed to a mayday which does that and you are declaring that the aircraft is in grave danger that will result in loss of life or a crash. That might have been the pilots assessment initially which is why they went for mayday. Or they just wanted to use mayday because they didn’t want to hold back which is fair too. Or they got flustered at the time under the pressure which is AOK. Yes you do get flustered under pressure and the workload is intense which is y I don’t go to the radio immediately and prefer to control my plane as I feel this is the thing that will kill me snd other people. As for the controllers and my deviations, they can wait and get other planes out of my way. Which is what they would do in real life anyway. Then I talk to them when I’m ready for it.
Mayday Mayday was the right call here because this was not just the case of an engine flame out and just flying on one engine which could easily get back to the airport. This was the case of uncontrolled destruction of the engine which was still on fire and with large pieces falling apart and from the engine. My guess is the right seat pilot could not see anything from his seat and more than likely neither pilot left their seats at this time of emergency to go and take a look from the cabin. Most probably, a flight attendant took a look and relayed the information to the crew in the cockpit, and from the FA's point of view, the engine is totally destroyed, still on fire and shaking like a leaf about to fall off the wing completely, which then can go anywhere, including the engine striking the Horizontal stabilizers and /or the tail, ripping it/them off completely, in which case, the plane would have crashed 100%, so the possibility of life and death situation was very real and present with this situation.
Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:
Then we conduct a Mayday or Pan pan call. I always opt for the pan pan as the plane never seems to fall out of the sky when I get these in the sim. United went for Mayday. Fair call there. The distinction is you are declaring an urgent emergency that is extremely urgent and requires activation of all emergency services as opposed to a mayday which does that and you are declaring that the aircraft is in grave danger that will result in loss of life or a crash. That might have been the pilots assessment initially which is why they went for mayday. Or they just wanted to use mayday because they didn’t want to hold back which is fair too. Or they got flustered at the time under the pressure which is AOK. Yes you do get flustered under pressure and the workload is intense which is y I don’t go to the radio immediately and prefer to control my plane as I feel this is the thing that will kill me snd other people. As for the controllers and my deviations, they can wait and get other planes out of my way. Which is what they would do in real life anyway. Then I talk to them when I’m ready for it.
Mayday Mayday was the right call here because this was not just the case of an engine flame out and just flying on one engine which could easily get back to the airport. This was the case of uncontrolled destruction of the engine which was still on fire and with large pieces falling apart and from the engine. My guess is the right seat pilot could not see anything from his seat and more than likely neither pilot left their seats at this time of emergency to go and take a look from the cabin. Most probably, a flight attendant took a look and relayed the information to the crew in the cockpit, and from the FA's point of view, the engine is totally destroyed, still on fire and shaking like a leaf about to fall off the wing completely, which then can go anywhere, including the engine striking the Horizontal stabilizers and /or the tail, ripping it/them off completely, in which case, the plane would have crashed 100%, so the possibility of life and death situation was very real and present with this situation.
Kikapu wrote:Londonrake wrote:Mayday - imminent threat to life. Pan - urgent situation?
I had a couple of Pan calls. Pull up a sandbag ........
I had few, the Pan, the Pan, the fucking Pan is burning call-out in the kitchen whenever the wife would cook.
Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:
Then we conduct a Mayday or Pan pan call. I always opt for the pan pan as the plane never seems to fall out of the sky when I get these in the sim. United went for Mayday. Fair call there. The distinction is you are declaring an urgent emergency that is extremely urgent and requires activation of all emergency services as opposed to a mayday which does that and you are declaring that the aircraft is in grave danger that will result in loss of life or a crash. That might have been the pilots assessment initially which is why they went for mayday. Or they just wanted to use mayday because they didn’t want to hold back which is fair too. Or they got flustered at the time under the pressure which is AOK. Yes you do get flustered under pressure and the workload is intense which is y I don’t go to the radio immediately and prefer to control my plane as I feel this is the thing that will kill me snd other people. As for the controllers and my deviations, they can wait and get other planes out of my way. Which is what they would do in real life anyway. Then I talk to them when I’m ready for it.
Mayday Mayday was the right call here because this was not just the case of an engine flame out and just flying on one engine which could easily get back to the airport. This was the case of uncontrolled destruction of the engine which was still on fire and with large pieces falling apart and from the engine. My guess is the right seat pilot could not see anything from his seat and more than likely neither pilot left their seats at this time of emergency to go and take a look from the cabin. Most probably, a flight attendant took a look and relayed the information to the crew in the cockpit, and from the FA's point of view, the engine is totally destroyed, still on fire and shaking like a leaf about to fall off the wing completely, which then can go anywhere, including the engine striking the Horizontal stabilizers and /or the tail, ripping it/them off completely, in which case, the plane would have crashed 100%, so the possibility of life and death situation was very real and present with this situation.
No one would leave their seat. They can see the front part of the engine but poor FO would just look over his shoulder for a second and confirm, yep it’s on fire. No time to communicate with cabin crew and even if they tried it’s highly unlikely we would pick up the handset during vital actions.
Engines have fallen off before. It’s a distinct possibility when an engine shakes itself apart like that. But as long as there is no structural damage to the wing.
If the wing or horizontal or vertical stabilisers are damaged, then I’m afraid there is not much of a chance of survival.
The Telegraph
Air travel will not return to normal levels for three years as OBR warns of slowdown similar to wake of 9/11
Tony Diver
Thu, March 4, 2021, 5:04 PM
Air travel will not be back to normal levels for at least three years, the Government’s independent forecaster has said, as it warned the industry of a slowdown similar to the aftermath of 9/11.
The Office for Budget Responsibility said it may take until the 2024-25 financial year for air passenger traffic to reach its pre-pandemic levels - the same length of time it took passengers to have confidence in airlines after the Twin Towers attack in 2001.
“We continue to expect a gradual recovery in passenger numbers, similar in pace to that observed in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the US, where US air passengers only exceeded pre-attack levels three years later,” the forecaster said.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/air-travel-n ... 18970.html
Londonrake wrote:I suspect that’s actually a difficult forecast to get right. Once this plague settles down to flu-like proportions and consequences I wouldn’t be surprised if there was an explosion (poor pun) in air travel.
Personally, I’ve flown on 11th September a couple of times since 2001 and always felt it was probably the safest day of the year to do so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest