cypezokyli mate, (if I can call you that?), do not be too disheartened by this debate. You dream of a single united Cyprus. I dream of a world without borders. Where would we be without dreams? But sometimes we can only take small steps towards that. I don't think we should say no to this because it falls short of where we want to be. As long as we are moving forward in right direction (and sometimes we end up on a bit of detour, such is life, but everything happens for a reason...).
I have only been writing on this forum for a short while, but already have been warmed to the various characters, their passionate rants, etc. I've made several direct contacts with GCs I've met through the Forum, which could lead to becoming social aquaintences, then new friends, business partners,...This is the way life normally evolves - naturally, slowly. We all checking each other out, learning about each other, vibing with each other.
ofcource u can call me mate
there are two schools of thought... one is step-by-step.
the other is, there is nothing more permanent than the temporal.
u refer to to the right direction. is division the right direction for a world without borders? or for a cyprus without borders?
there are step-by-step processes that could be taken for unifying the island...but you see, you are not giving me such proposals
we ve got ideas plugged into our heads my dear rude gal, by which we can even view the whole world different, but our stuborness when it comes to our own problem, proves the emptyness in our "progressiveness".
most of these arguments start with : we tried this before, and it failed..it is obvious we can not live together...and you are talking to me about a world without borders and dreams? there s song in greek that sais : "it worths my friend to exist for a dream, even if the end its fire will burn you" ... who knows, one day i ll grow up. the problem is that growing up implicitly assumes - no dreams.
i know that germany is a whole different situation than us. do you know how many serious people say that the reunification should have happened on a step-by-step process ? people are now saying it happened too fast. the truth is, that if it didnt happen the way it did, it would never had happened. a rational thinker would have never argued to reunify. thats the problem we also have here. we calculate everything on legal terms, and rational thinking, the kind of thinking that can work in math or physics, but it does not work like that with people. thats what i believe.
you know this republic of paphos thing ..started as a joke...
now the more i think about it, the more i believe : why the hell not?
step -by-step, as all of you people say. i mean , think about it. we create a third state of people who voluntarily live together. and the people who want most propably they will manage. is just an intermidiate step, in the step-by-step process. its a step that will show all the rest that it is possible. what better step can you propose ?
and i honestly cannot understand why it disturbs people who want to draw lines. i mean its just a line more. what difference would it make? i am just using the same arguments as all of you. you just split people on ethnik identities and i split the on beliefs. want to live together or not. its not funny anymore rudy.. if all of you people decide to brake the island in pieces, then i also want my piece. its rational all the way
Can't rush a good thing! Laughing So patience bro, if our dialogue is anthing to go by, we all moving in one direction - closer together!
u remind me of an old experience i had. "give me space to come back". take a wild guess, if the space was used to come back or to leave for good . take your wildest guess rude gal. i cannot be convinced that moving apart is the direction to come closer together.
i think have to stop bc i am just becoming emotional here, and i am supposed to be using political arguments...
cypezokyli