Paphitis wrote:. His hair style is just fine and at least he doesn't ride horses topless on national TV like some closet gay! You do know that Pootin is a closet homosexual.
Paphitis wrote:. His hair style is just fine and at least he doesn't ride horses topless on national TV like some closet gay! You do know that Pootin is a closet homosexual.
Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:miltiades wrote:When the Clown says that Russia must be dealt with before its too late, what does he mean exactly !!
How will Russia be ...dealt with ??
It takes a ...clown to know a clown!!
By the way, can you perhaps gift him a hair brush ??
He friggin means that the West needs a united front and it also means that the West needs to be a lot more decisive when dealing with Assad's war crimes against his own people.
He also means that the West is able to hit at Pootin in more decisive ways such as a boycott on the World Cup and the closure of all diplomatic offices and embassies.
His hair style is just fine and at least he doesn't ride horses topless on national TV like some closet gay! You do know that Pootin is a closet homosexual.
Suppose Australia closed all it's diplomatic offices and embassy in Russia, do you know what could happen to an Aussie who lost it's passport while traveling in Russia? Or has been robbed and has no money to return?
You will gain nothing from doing such a stupid thing. Not even Hitler did.
People should stop traveling to these countries.
Australia is not responsible if any citizens make stupid decisions. So many times there are citizens traveling to even Capital Punishment countries with medications and no documentation or scripts.
Sometimes people are just stupid.
Likewise, a Russian will need to watch out in Australia too. It's a 2 way sword.
We will gain because Russia will have no diplomatic relations with many countries in the West and that is more costly for them than us. It would also infuriate Pootin, that he may temper his behaviour.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:miltiades wrote:When the Clown says that Russia must be dealt with before its too late, what does he mean exactly !!
How will Russia be ...dealt with ??
It takes a ...clown to know a clown!!
By the way, can you perhaps gift him a hair brush ??
He friggin means that the West needs a united front and it also means that the West needs to be a lot more decisive when dealing with Assad's war crimes against his own people.
He also means that the West is able to hit at Pootin in more decisive ways such as a boycott on the World Cup and the closure of all diplomatic offices and embassies.
His hair style is just fine and at least he doesn't ride horses topless on national TV like some closet gay! You do know that Pootin is a closet homosexual.
Suppose Australia closed all it's diplomatic offices and embassy in Russia, do you know what could happen to an Aussie who lost it's passport while traveling in Russia? Or has been robbed and has no money to return?
You will gain nothing from doing such a stupid thing. Not even Hitler did.
People should stop traveling to these countries.
Australia is not responsible if any citizens make stupid decisions. So many times there are citizens traveling to even Capital Punishment countries with medications and no documentation or scripts.
Sometimes people are just stupid.
Likewise, a Russian will need to watch out in Australia too. It's a 2 way sword.
We will gain because Russia will have no diplomatic relations with many countries in the West and that is more costly for them than us. It would also infuriate Pootin, that he may temper his behaviour.
You are totally wrong. It's a fundamental duty of any government either through embassies or consulates or proxy embassies/consulates to protect and serve it's citizens in foreign countries. And this of course include anyone no matter how stupid s/he is either he travels for business or holidays or whatever.
Furthermore how can you forbid people traveling to and from Russia when at the good times you had a 30+billion trade?
Which I assume with Australia's suctions dropped to the lowest possible level of what 435 (?) million
https://tradingeconomics.com/australia/ ... rom-russia
You simply can't. Unless of course you want Australia to demonstrate less government legitimacy.
It's just plain daft like shooting yourself in the foot.
Paphitis wrote:No it isn't Australia's duty at all.
If an Australian Citizen goes to places like North Korea, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus or Russia without diplomatic representation, then Australia will not be offering any assistance in those countries because it does not have diplomatic channels in those places.
In other words, the Australian Government posts travel warnings and if people ignore these warnings it is a "travel at your own risk"
Australia will not for instance engage North Korea just because an Australian citizen is in trouble there. That places North Korea in a position of power and they could blackmail the Australian Government and the Australian Government will not negotiate like this or place itself in a vulnerable position.
No one has the right to place Australia in such a position.
They will not negotiate with terrorists or criminal regimes like Assad either. If someone is caught by Islamic State and about to be beheaded, then the Australian Government does its negotiations with an F-18F.
It's not Australia's obligation to run around trying to help every idiot that is caught doing something completely irresponsible or stupid.
People need to understand this.
Australian citizens are also entitled for consular assistance from Canada if a Canadian Mission exists in those places.
People need to get over themselves and be responsible for their actions.
Londonrake wrote:US on Turkey’s purchase of S400:
http://cyprus-mail.com/2018/04/27/us-pr ... se-russia/
.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:US on Turkey’s purchase of S400:
http://cyprus-mail.com/2018/04/27/us-pr ... se-russia/
.
Aha! So the the S-400 are not compatible with NATO’s defenses huh?
The stupid Turks might shoot down their own F-16 right?
Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:No it isn't Australia's duty at all.
If an Australian Citizen goes to places like North Korea, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus or Russia without diplomatic representation, then Australia will not be offering any assistance in those countries because it does not have diplomatic channels in those places.
In other words, the Australian Government posts travel warnings and if people ignore these warnings it is a "travel at your own risk"
Australia will not for instance engage North Korea just because an Australian citizen is in trouble there. That places North Korea in a position of power and they could blackmail the Australian Government and the Australian Government will not negotiate like this or place itself in a vulnerable position.
No one has the right to place Australia in such a position.
They will not negotiate with terrorists or criminal regimes like Assad either. If someone is caught by Islamic State and about to be beheaded, then the Australian Government does its negotiations with an F-18F.
It's not Australia's obligation to run around trying to help every idiot that is caught doing something completely irresponsible or stupid.
People need to understand this.
Australian citizens are also entitled for consular assistance from Canada if a Canadian Mission exists in those places.
People need to get over themselves and be responsible for their actions.
Don't mix up places where the Government (in your case the Govnt of Australia) has issued warnings.
Has it issued warnings to it's people traveling to Russia? Has it closed down it's embassy in Russia?
As for the occupied I won't be surprised to learn they have the British as proxies albeit neither they have official diplomatic relations but they do have a British Council branch and the UN mission that could act as proxies. The last resort would be to use their diplomatic representation in Turkey.
Make no mistake. Although most countries are not obliged by their laws to help their citizens in need in foreign countries, refusal to do so exposes them in having less of an international government legitimacy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests