The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Propose and discuss specific solutions to aspects of the Cyprus Problem

Are views expressed by Paphitis on ANYTHING reasonable

Poll ended at Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:28 pm
Note: Your vote in this poll is NOT confidential. Your username will be displayed under the option(s) you select

1. Yes they are.
2
33%
 
Get Real!, Schnauzer
2. No they are a load of old cobblers.
1
17%
 
miltiades
3.
3
50%
 
GreekIslandGirl, kurupetos, repulsewarrior
 
Total votes : 6

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby miltiades » Thu Mar 15, 2018 4:58 pm

An attack on the UK as severe as Pearl Harbour !!
What an absolute fucking shit. Are you for real you blithering idiot !!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Get Real! » Thu Mar 15, 2018 5:19 pm

Britain is EXTREMELY lucky that the current Russian president is a very placid character. I hope someone else steps in his place soon that won’t be as tolerant… in which case Britain would be turned into glass within 20 minutes. :lol:

Are you stupid Brits for fucking real… issuing "ultimatums" to a superpower that can wipe you in a flash? :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Robin Hood » Thu Mar 15, 2018 5:30 pm

Why does the UK not reveal the evidence? This has happened before in the US and they blamed Russia but then had to back peddle when it turned out the agent came from a US facility. Once again MoA fills in a few blanks in the story ......... but you won’t find this in the MSM as it does not fit with the view being promulgated by May and the other Western governments all too keen to jump on the anti-Russia band wagon.

This is going to end in tears and they won’t be Russian tears!

From Moon of Alabama a pragmatic analysis.

Are 'Novichok' Poisons Real? - May's Claims Fall Apart

The British government claims that 'Novichok' poisons, developed 30 years ago in the Soviet Union, affected a British double agent. But such substances may not exist at all. The British government further says that the Russian government is responsible for the incident and has announced penalties against the country.

A comparable incidents happened in 2001 in the United States. Envelopes with Anthrax spores were sent to various politicians. Some people died. The White House told the FBI to blame al-Qaeda but the Anthrax turned out to be from a U.S. chemical-biological weapon laboratory. The case is still unsolved.

The 'whistle-blower' Vil Mirzanyanov who 'revealed' the 'Novichok' program and its poisons published chemical formulas that should enable any decent laboratory to reproduce them. But neither the existence of the claimed program nor the existence of the alleged substances were ever accepted by the scientific community. The Russian government says it does not know the program nor the alleged poisons.

The highly constructed drama around the alleged poisoning of a British double agent Skripal and his daughter has thus turned into a surreal play. The British government has so far given no evidence that the Skripal's were poisoned at all, or that they were poisoned by someone else. No detailed medical bulletin was published. The British accusations against Russia lets one assume that a suicide attempt has been excluded. Why?

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/theresa-mays-novichok-claims-fall-apart.html#more


The attempt to bring Russia down is persistent to say the least. Is it because Russia is becoming a political threat to US hegemony and the US does not like the way things are going as more countries look turn to Russia as the Worlds stabilising power? :?: :o

BTW: Paphitis ...... look up what a Troll is on the Internet ..... then look in the mirror! YOU are the troll, not me. I just have views that are contrary to yours but I give a reason/link for others to make up their own minds, you just spout ill-informed propaganda! :roll: :x
Robin Hood
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4347
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby miltiades » Thu Mar 15, 2018 5:46 pm

An attack on the ...UK. As potent as ...Hiroshima !!! Or is it Pearl Harbour?
Maybe its ...Nawusaki ?
Anyone dead yet ?
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:13 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote: There was never an exchange but what there was is quite…


Of course there was an exchange. In fact Sergei Skripal was in a group of 14 exchanged in 2010.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/ ... es-swap-us

Furthermore that particular exchange was not based on nationality. Skripal was a Russian citizen and the UK itself demanded he was among those spies who would be exchanged.
One of the spies was a Cypriot presumably of Canadian nationality.
Exchanges based on nationality happen all the time usually by deporting each other’s (confirmed or just suspected to be) spies.

Paphitis wrote: Once again, the West does not exchange any "Double Agents". That is something that can't happen and is a terrible violation of their human rights as n doubt these people have family and loved ones.


Did they exchange Skripal or did they not? Was Skripal a Double Agent or was he not.

Paphitis wrote: No Russia isn't the only country to make Nerve Agents. North Korea, China, Iran and maybe Israel also produce similar Nerve Agents. But it is the only known country to make this particular chemical composition, and the reason why they know this is because the person who made the compound now lives in America and works for American Interests, and American would not attack an enemy with a Nerve Agent let alone the UK in a false flag.


Ex USSR and Russia is not the same thing. In fact that nerve Agent was made in one of the Ex USSR countries which later on the Americans presumably helped clean up.You just confirmed that the person who made the compound now lives in America and works for American Interests.

So, just because the Americans wouldn’t do it, then the conclusion is it was the Russians who did it, right?
I have never seen a more naïve accusation. It this the best thing the UK government can do?
I am really anxious to watch it’s total humiliation at the UN


10 Russian sleepers exchanged for 4 double agents. That may have happened, but these 10 individuals were Russian sleepers inserted somehow into America by the FSB.

The Americans would not transfer US Citizens. That is not possible.

But there are a lot more than 14. There must literally be hundreds if not thousands of Russian Asylum Seekers into the USA, Canada, AUS, UK and NZ. Many of these people (not all) served Russia in the Military or even the FSB.

The person who made the Chemical compound that the Russians used the UK to kill Skripal and his Daughter, has asylum in the USA and works for the Americans.

There are lots of these guys. For instance, there is a Russian Rocket Scientist in Australia working on the DSTO's Rocket and Missile program. Yes Australia does test some rocket and missile technology at the Woomera Firing Range. Also, we have a Russian Engineer working on Australian defence Aircraft. these are not migrants. They were not even citizens. They are new to Australia and their names are fake.

I also know Australia arranges their marriages. They marry them off to an Australian Girl for citizenship. The Girl is probably an agent for all we know as well, and paid hansomly beyond anyone's comprehension.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:17 am

miltiades wrote:An attack on the UK as severe as Pearl Harbour !!
What an absolute fucking shit. Are you for real you blithering idiot !!


Yes I am for real you stupid malakas baliobelopetsoyero ilithie vlaka ton aionon.

Russia attacked the UK with a Chemical nerve agent which targeted one of their former agents and his daughter and also resulted in another 20 critically ill.

That is a very significant attack on UK sovereignty and most definitely an act of war and massive violation of International Law.
Last edited by Paphitis on Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:20 am

miltiades wrote:An attack on the ...UK. As potent as ...Hiroshima !!! Or is it Pearl Harbour?
Maybe its ...Nawusaki ?
Anyone dead yet ?


Reh vlaka!

The USA was at war with japan at the time for so many years.

It's not the same. Russia used a chemical agent against the UK in peace time.

The USA and UK have never done this to the former Soviet Union or Russia. And they never will.

But the will expel Russian diplomats. Too little in my opinion. In my opinion, Western Countries should be closing their Russian Embassies, send back ALL Russian Diplomats, and boycott the World Cup even though I got tickets which I have insured.

Only this will make any difference.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:22 am

Get Real! wrote:Britain is EXTREMELY lucky that the current Russian president is a very placid character. I hope someone else steps in his place soon that won’t be as tolerant… in which case Britain would be turned into glass within 20 minutes. :lol:

Are you stupid Brits for fucking real… issuing "ultimatums" to a superpower that can wipe you in a flash? :lol:


The USA can wipe Pootin in a flash. And it isn't just the UK. It is the USA, Germany and France, and their ICBM's are much closer to Russia than his are to America so he will turn to glass first before even the first one arrives in US airspace. He would want to get them away within 60 minutes because their won't be a Pootin or Russia after that. And that is just from the UK's and France's missiles alone.

Germany, UK and France alone are stronger than Russia before even taking into account the Americans.

make no mistake about it.

Plus, the West have spent Billions on Air Defence and his missiles are not indestructible.

As per usual, the weak cry and scream their threats the loudest. The strong remain silent, like the Rich also keep quiet whilst the pretenders make the noise.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby miltiades » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:35 am

As per usual General wewe Malakas spews more crap. I see the Pervert also considers your views reasonable, but he also considers ISIS views as reasonable as well as pervasive acts.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:38 am

Get Real! wrote:Britain is EXTREMELY lucky that the current Russian president is a very placid character. I hope someone else steps in his place soon that won’t be as tolerant… in which case Britain would be turned into glass within 20 minutes. :lol:

Are you stupid Brits for fucking real… issuing "ultimatums" to a superpower that can wipe you in a flash? :lol:


In addition, UK is a victim of a State Sponsored Attack. All evidence points to Russia. The only one with this specific compound and motive. Pootin benefits from creating this situation because of the elections. It secures his vote as he poses as the victim from the evil West.

UK, has every right to protest this violation of International law against them.

To say that the UK should shut up because Russia is a superpower, is te same as saying Cyprus should shut up and accept the partition and even annexation of Cyprus because Turkey is like 100 times stronger.

It's not on!

But you are right. The world is entering a very dangerous phase where countries like Russia and Turkey will get away with all their illegalities. MIGHT = RIGHT.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem Solution Proposals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests