B25 wrote:Here is an interesting writeup about the US and Turkey relations, more interesting is this:
' ... According to a report in the Washington Examiner, the Pentagon has a low opinion of Turkish capabilities. Turkish troops lack “the training, logistics and weaponry to successfully launch the siege of a fortified and well-defended city.”....'
read the whole report here:
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018 ... in-turkey/
This paragraph was an interesting concept :
The U.S. responded to Erdogan’s move against Incirlik by expanding its air operations in Romania. And last summer, Germany’s Die Welt reported that the German military had identified eight alternatives to Incirlik, including three sites each in Kuwait and Jordan and two in Cyprus.
I assume they are referring to Paphos and Larnaca? The idea of USAF stationed in Cyprus and the Tukish military within a few miles would not be a good idea .... maybe for the US but not RoC. Maybe the Turks are better than the average for the region?
No matter how powerful or sophisticated the weapons these ME countries have, the forces that use them are not up to much. You have only to watch them in action on the news reels to see that.
One thing you can be sure of is that the US will do whatever suits the US. Loyalty does not come into the equation and I don’t think the Kurds will be treated as anything but cannon fodder. If the US is able to abandon their own to sort it out (USS Liberty) nothing would surprise me. The US will sacrifice the Kurds without giving them a second thought !
Remember it’s ....... “America first!” and that is with everything not just trade.