Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Greek nationalism: Belief in dichotomy forming a “Greek” part and “Turkish” part.
That is the most stupid think you ever wrote. Nationalism of any kind is bad and can lead to bad things, but no kind of nationalist, "Greek" or "Cypriot", wants Cyprus to be split in “Greek” and “Turkish” parts. Any Greek Cypriot that accepts such thing accepts it as a compromise (apart maybe from a few traitors). The only nationalist party in Cyprus is ELAM, and they are definitely "Greek nationalists" and they are the ones who openly support a unitary Cypriot state as a solution. So your argument doesn't hold at all.
The Greek government’s collusion in the 1974 dichotomy of Cyprus is a well known fact Sotos, and the Cypriot traitors who were Greek nationalists and executed the dichotomy plan with the removal of Makarios, knew exactly what they were doing... as Sampson later verified.
In fact the Greek government was upset when Turkey went PAST the pre-agreed demarcation line! No honor among criminals!
Why else would EOKA B carry out a coup to remove the Cypriot democratically elected president of an independent UN-member Cyprus, if not to facilitate dichotomy and destroy this independence?
Get Real! wrote:kurupetos wrote:Sotos wrote:Greek nationalism: Belief in dichotomy forming a “Greek” part and “Turkish” part.
That is the most stupid think you ever wrote. Nationalism of any kind is bad and can lead to bad things, but no kind of nationalist, "Greek" or "Cypriot", wants Cyprus to be split in “Greek” and “Turkish” parts. Any Greek Cypriot that accepts such thing accepts it as a compromise (apart maybe from a few traitors). The only nationalist party in Cyprus is ELAM, and they are definitely "Greek nationalists" and they are the ones who openly support a unitary Cypriot state as a solution. So your argument doesn't hold at all.
I agree.
So how do you go about implementing enosis with Greece Kurupet, without the dissolution of the republic?
Surely you didn’t assume you can accommodate them both?
repulsewarrior wrote:...i remember. Cyprus is temporary, the Flag of Cyprus is a rag. To some this is true; "Greek", or "Turk".
kurupetos wrote:repulsewarrior wrote:...i remember. Cyprus is temporary, the Flag of Cyprus is a rag. To some this is true; "Greek", or "Turk".
No, Cyprus is not temporary...but the RoC is definitely something we don't need to keep forever.
The vast majority of Cypriots has expressed a desire for Enosis in 1821, 1878, 1930, 1950 and 1955-1959.
repulsewarrior wrote:kurupetos wrote:repulsewarrior wrote:...i remember. Cyprus is temporary, the Flag of Cyprus is a rag. To some this is true; "Greek", or "Turk".
No, Cyprus is not temporary...but the RoC is definitely something we don't need to keep forever.
The vast majority of Cypriots has expressed a desire for Enosis in 1821, 1878, 1930, 1950 and 1955-1959.
...you have it the other way around. Cyprus is not temporary, "Greece" is. Greeks don't need "Greeks", they are Citizens of the world (and this in Cyprus as Cypriots represented, despite "Greeks"/"Turks" and as they represent(ed) themselves').
What is Cyprus is Cyprus, it is an island after all. What is a "motherland" or a "fatherland" is unclear, what are the facts today is that Greece like Cyprus, and Turkey, are equals among many.
One day the city's name may return, what is East to Rome; a dream to "Greeks", what is Greek in Turkey returned, who just like "Turks", have the same sense of "belonging".
"Greeks" and "Turks" are the same. "They" are not the same as Cypriots (or Greeks, or Turks). Greek and Turkish mostly, yes, to describe them, Cypriots as people, but, who in effect, as a People, with roots much older.
Greeks as a Nation have in effect two States to look to as representing Greeks in the Modern world. Indeed the modern world should be looked at by Greeks with a great deal of humility, what with its "Greekness".
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest