Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Here are my first really complicated programs for use with a GPS program for Symbian phones.
As you can see the owner of the program called MGmaps set them both on top. And these were back in 2011.

http://forum.mgmaps.com/viewforum.php?f=13

But of course you are the world's top programmer, we should therefore believe every nonsense you serve us.

Did you read and understand my last post, Pyro?

[Pyrpolizer]

Here are my first really complicated programs for use with a GPS program for Symbian phones.
As you can see the owner of the program called MGmaps set them both on top. And these were back in 2011.

http://forum.mgmaps.com/viewforum.php?f=13

But of course you are the world's top programmer, we should therefore believe every nonsense you serve us.

Did you read and understand my last post, Pyro?

All I know is that you fart too much

[Get Real!]

It looks like you’re incorrigible so you’ve made your bed and now you’ll sleep in it!

Now listen here you little fleabag...

There is no such thing as a “tree approach of binaries” because it is utter nonsense in the English language, and utter nonsense in the programming world.

As for binary trees, they are well covered in programming 101 (well at least the 8bit version) but it’s obvious you haven’t studied in this science.

You can’t be posting things that you half-understood from some article and then use them in debate with seasoned programmers, well not unless you want to make a total fool of yourself.

So tell me… what compels you to make a total dick of yourself in this way and more importantly, what possessed you to post your childish "map conversions"?

Did you really think you’re going to impress me with your childish tossings?



It’s very easy for me to be condescending to a nincompoop like you Pyro in a topic like this, but it’s not my preferred way… you made this decision.

[Sotos]

GR, your beliefs are based on religion and not on any knowledge you have on the AI subject. Personally I doubt you even have a university degree of any kind, let alone one in Computer Science / Engineering or anything related. You learned some technical skills in the 80s and somehow you believe you are an expert about everything related to technology. What you exhibit is the Dunning–Kruger effect:

In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority derives from the metacognitive inability of low-ability persons to recognize their own ineptitude; without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E ... ger_effect

I know more than you on this subject, which is why I know I am not an expert and I can appreciate the expertise of people like Demis Hassabis. I am also not blinded by religion, so I do not dismiss scientific breakthroughs just because they don't align with religious beliefs.

[Get Real!]

Look at all the stupid things you were posting from the onset you idiotic little wombat...

“Chess is just one of the examples that a computer would need billions of trillions of years to examine all possibilities…”

What the fuck were you smoking?

Just because we ignored your childish tossings doesn’t mean that what you were writing was OK Pyro… it was downright STUPID, but why bog down with your feeble brain?

You think I find you interesting?

Instead, most of us who knew better turned a blind eye and pressed on with the topic.

[Get Real!]

GR, your beliefs are based on religion and not on any knowledge you have on the AI subject. Personally I doubt you even have a university degree of any kind, let alone one in Computer Science / Engineering or anything related. You learned some technical skills in the 80s and somehow you believe you are an expert about everything related to technology. What you exhibit is the Dunning–Kruger effect:

In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority derives from the metacognitive inability of low-ability persons to recognize their own ineptitude; without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E ... ger_effect

I know more than you on this subject, which is why I know I am not an expert and I can appreciate the expertise of people like Demis Hassabis. I am also not blinded by religion, so I do not dismiss scientific breakthroughs just because they don't align with religious beliefs.

Isn't it interesting that someone allegedly suffering from "Dunning–Kruger" was able to programmatically describe in great detail how the Google team were able to attain perfect results, which; with your touted qualifications, you should be able to evaluate?

So why don't you go back and re-read how I explained it in detail and come back with technical fault/criticism of my theory.

Show us what your qualifications can do for you...

[Sotos]

GR, your beliefs are based on religion and not on any knowledge you have on the AI subject. Personally I doubt you even have a university degree of any kind, let alone one in Computer Science / Engineering or anything related. You learned some technical skills in the 80s and somehow you believe you are an expert about everything related to technology. What you exhibit is the Dunning–Kruger effect:

In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority derives from the metacognitive inability of low-ability persons to recognize their own ineptitude; without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E ... ger_effect

I know more than you on this subject, which is why I know I am not an expert and I can appreciate the expertise of people like Demis Hassabis. I am also not blinded by religion, so I do not dismiss scientific breakthroughs just because they don't align with religious beliefs.

Isn't it interesting that someone allegedly suffering from "Dunning–Kruger" was able to programmatically describe in great detail how the Google team were able to attain perfect results, which with your touted qualifications should be able to evaluate?

So why don't you go back and re-read how I explained it in detail and come back with technical fault/criticism of my theory.

Show us what your qualifications can do for you...

I've already responded to your theory in my reply to you: "So no lookup tables, not to mention that calculating every possible move is impossible with a game like Go, whose possible games are more than the atoms of the universe." If you think you know as much as the team at Google then why don't you prove it by making software that would beat theirs? Lets face it, you couldn't write chess software that would beat an amateur, let alone expert chess players. Scratch that, you couldn't even make any kind of chess software ... even the most incompetent chess software is beyond your abilities. So wake up from your illusion that you supposedly know how a team of experts at Google are able to attain such results. Google bought the company of Demis Hassabis for £400 million and yet a loser like you believes you can know as much (or more!) than he does. You know so little that you are not even able to appreciate how little you know. A classic case of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

[Get Real!]

I've already responded to your theory in my reply to you: "So no lookup tables, not to mention that calculating every possible move is impossible with a game like Go, whose possible games are more than the atoms of the universe." If you think you know as much as the team at Google then why don't you prove it by making software that would beat theirs? Lets face it, you couldn't write chess software that would beat an amateur, let alone expert chess players. Scratch that, you couldn't even make any kind of chess software ... even the most incompetent chess software is beyond your abilities. So wake up from your illusion that you supposedly know how a team of experts at Google are able to attain such results. Google bought the company of Demis Hassabis for £400 million and yet a loser like you believes you can know as much (or more!) than he does. You know so little that you are not even able to appreciate how little you know. A classic case of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

It doesn’t look like you are able to evaluate my theory Sotos.

Are you sure you’re qualified in CS?

Why don’t you show us some of your work then?

Send it to me privately,if you don’t want everyone else to know…

[Get Real!]

Ok, what about your thesis Sotos… talk to me about that.

We can go private if you want.

[Sotos]

I've already responded to your theory in my reply to you: "So no lookup tables, not to mention that calculating every possible move is impossible with a game like Go, whose possible games are more than the atoms of the universe." If you think you know as much as the team at Google then why don't you prove it by making software that would beat theirs? Lets face it, you couldn't write chess software that would beat an amateur, let alone expert chess players. Scratch that, you couldn't even make any kind of chess software ... even the most incompetent chess software is beyond your abilities. So wake up from your illusion that you supposedly know how a team of experts at Google are able to attain such results. Google bought the company of Demis Hassabis for £400 million and yet a loser like you believes you can know as much (or more!) than he does. You know so little that you are not even able to appreciate how little you know. A classic case of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

It doesn’t look like you are able to evaluate my theory Sotos.

Are you sure you’re qualified in CS?

Why don’t you show us some of your work then?

Send it to me privately,if you don’t want everyone else to know…

That would compromise my anonymity since my work is like an ID in my case But lets say that I had no good skills and the reason I didn't want to show my work was because I was ashamed of it. In that case I would still be good enough to at least understand how bad my work is. In your case you are so clueless you don't even realize how clueless you are and you shamelessly promote things like "your browser" and you believe it is better than Chrome or Firefox! It is that "illusory superiority" of the Dunning–Kruger effect.