.I think you are referring to the Khazar Hypothesis of the origin of the Ashkenasim, which is seemingly a 19th Century invention and where the genetic have seemingly found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among Ashkenazi Jews, abut rather evidence they have mixed Near Eastern/Mediterranean and Southern European origins
I am not an expert on the origins of the Jewish people but the people who produced the article I have to believe know more than I do. I have to rely on those who are credible. I post something credible that has the expertise I lack and the authors who, unlike you, provides links to their sources. Probability says it is likely more true than not, although not necessarily 100% accurate.
I was going purely on my memory and had read about this tie to a race of pagans in the region of the Caspian and Black Sea but that was many years ago, I was wrong apparently.
You refer to the ‘...... origins to the Khazar Hypothesis of the origin of the Ashkenasim.’ It is not an hypothesis, that is simply your opinion. The Ashkenazims origins have been scientifically proved to be predominantly Eastern European, although not exclusively so, but enough to say that the Zionists exclusive claims to the area of Jerusalem and Palestine as their birth-right as told to them by their God, ...... has a few holes in it. The Sephardic Jews are the ones that came from Spain and Southern Europe.
So I post the follow studies based on modern technology rather than relying on vague historical documents written a couple of millennia ago by several authors about whom we know very little.
It seems, as far as I understand what they are saying, that the female Ashkenazim line is around 80% European DNA and the male DNA says around 30%, the average being 60-80% of their DNA indicating European origin.. So the ‘ME’ origin is a minor part of the mix. Your statement is not accurate according to modern research. I think your 19th century reference relates to the beginning of Zionism not the Jews origins?
https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37821/title/Genetic-Roots-of-the-Ashkenazi-Jews/
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a ... en.1006644
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html
Personally I have no problem with the Jews having a homeland in Palestine. Jews have had a homeland there for centuries. It is the demand of ‘exclusive entitlement’ to the area as a homeland ONLY for Zionists and Jews, that I have problems with ..... as it seems, so do most of the rest of the World apart from Trump ..... who assumed he is speaking for the American People! I don’t think he does to be honest from my conversations over the years with Americans.
If the situation was purely a religious one there would be no problem. Once the Zionists decided to piggy-back on Judaism and use the Jewish association to create their own State, then the trouble starts. IMO: A version of the original UN proposal for the partition of the region would be equitable for both the Jews and the Arabs. With Jerusalem and with 10% of the surrounding land declared as an International Zone of religious significance is the sensible answer. I think Trumps action has turfed the US out of any further negotiations on the solution. The Zionists and those in the US have to be taken out of the equation!!!