Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lordo]

First the report by the experts will determine whether this girl needed to be killed.
Second it will also determine lethal force to kill was needed to disarm the girl.
Thir it wil also find out why it happened. For al lyou know these two individuals were involved in some drug deals so taking one side or the other is your stupid nature.

But your real stupidity is relating it to BLM and in effect saying that BLM is not needed.

You are fucking wrong because a lot of cities have taken on board the idea of defunding the police, training others to handle certain situations where police should not even be there never mind armed. And of course what will also come out is did this girl have mental issues and was it dealt with.

But the asshole that you are you just jumped in defending the police killing black people.

As to the media, they perhaps felt it was not appropriate to display such graphic detail and even the police referred to it as a tragic incident. Clearly not your interpretation or the fascist news media you are following.

[Paphitis]

First the report by the experts will determine whether this girl needed to be killed.
Second it will also determine lethal force to kill was needed to disarm the girl.
Thir it wil also find out why it happened. For al lyou know these two individuals were involved in some drug deals so taking one side or the other is your stupid nature.

But your real stupidity is relating it to BLM and in effect saying that BLM is not needed.

You are fucking wrong because a lot of cities have taken on board the idea of defunding the police, training others to handle certain situations where police should not even be there never mind armed. And of course what will also come out is did this girl have mental issues and was it dealt with.

But the asshole that you are you just jumped in defending the police killing black people.

As to the media, they perhaps felt it was not appropriate to display such graphic detail and even the police referred to it as a tragic incident. Clearly not your interpretation or the fascist news media you are following.

Oh sure!

Well they an stick the report because if the cop didn't do what he obviously needed to do, then another girl would have been murdered.

The media related it to BLM with all the fake innuendos and false narrative, framing this as another cop shooting against a 16 year old girl, with no mention as to why the cop had to pull the trigger. No mention whatsoever that the animal was about to plunge a big arse knift into the guts of another girl.

[Lordo]

You still don't get it boy. There is something in some of the GC minds that loves to see people killed and gets pleasure out of it. When Kochina was surrounded with tanks and the 800 civilians and the 500 students to landed there from Turkey back in 1964, when the firing started and they were about to be pulverized, some GCs gathered on the surrounding hills having picnic and looking forward to a bit of slaughter of some TCs.

Of course they did not count on what TAF was about to do next after repeated warning to them to pull their forces back.

You mean al the other black people slaughtered needlessly by the police are just innuendoes and false news. You stupid ass. Go back to humping roos gavole.

[Maximus]

You still don't get it boy. There is something in some of the GC minds that loves to see people killed and gets pleasure out of it. When Kochina was surrounded with tanks and the 800 civilians and the 500 students to landed there from Turkey back in 1964, when the firing started and they were about to be pulverized, some GCs gathered on the surrounding hills having picnic and looking forward to a bit of slaughter of some TCs.

Of course they did not count on what TAF was about to do next after repeated warning to them to pull their forces back.

You mean al the other black people slaughtered needlessly by the police are just innuendoes and false news. You stupid ass. Go back to humping roos gavole.

Cool story,

Which basically supports the point Paphitis's is trying to make.

But you lack the self awareness and you are too thick to understand,

[Kikapu]

The cop who shot the 16 year old in the back 4 times is likely to be guilty of using excessive deadly force, racism and murder, since he had other options which would have been less severe. He may end up sharing a cell with Chauvin.

Any cop who shoots anyone in the back when the victim is no threat to them, can ONLY be a CUNT. That will be the starting point to them.

I say the above points because it is not the police’s responsibility to protect us, and the Federal courts have ruled on this few times, therefore, it was not the responsibility of the cop to shoot the 16 year old in the back, even if she was going to hurt someone else other than the police officer.

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody,” he pointed out.

https://mises.org/power-market/police-h ... -yet-again

[Maximus]

The cop who shot the 16 year old in the back 4 times is likely to be guilty of using excessive deadly force, racism and murder, since he had other options which would have been less severe. He may end up sharing a cell with Chauvin.

Any cop who shoots anyone in the back when the victim is no threat to them, can ONLY be a CUNT. That will be the starting point to them.

I say the above points because it is not the police’s responsibility to protect us, and the Federal courts have ruled on this few times, therefore, it was not the responsibility of the cop to shoot the 16 year old in the back, even if she was going to hurt someone else other than the police officer.

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody,” he pointed out.

Their motto is to protect and to serve.

Especially when they are present at the scene of a crime or a crime in the making.

The first line in that bold quote does not say that they can not and it is against the constitution or state law to protect individuals from harm.

If he didnt protect the other girl from getting stabbed, she could have been the one dead now and the narrative by those who have something negative to say about it would be something else.

Unfortunately, the police officer cant be a hero but only the villain in this upside down world.

What would you be saying if that was your daughter, about to be stabbed...

[Kikapu]

The cop who shot the 16 year old in the back 4 times is likely to be guilty of using excessive deadly force, racism and murder, since he had other options which would have been less severe. He may end up sharing a cell with Chauvin.

Any cop who shoots anyone in the back when the victim is no threat to them, can ONLY be a CUNT. That will be the starting point to them.

I say the above points because it is not the police’s responsibility to protect us, and the Federal courts have ruled on this few times, therefore, it was not the responsibility of the cop to shoot the 16 year old in the back, even if she was going to hurt someone else other than the police officer.

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody,” he pointed out.

Their motto is to protect and to serve.

Especially when they are present at the scene of a crime or a crime in the making.

The first line in that bold quote does not say that they can not and it is against the constitution or state law to protect individuals from harm.

If he didnt protect the other girl from getting stabbed, she could have been the one dead now and the narrative by those who have something negative to say about it would be something else.

Unfortunately, the police officer cant be a hero but only the villain in this upside down world.

What would you be saying if that was your daughter, about to be stabbed...

At the time the cop shot the girl with the knife, no injury had occurred yet. The only crime perhaps threatening someone with a knife. We have no idea if the shot girl was protecting herself from the other girl. Who had the knife first. No one is hurt yet. The cop acts as Jury, Judge and Executioner without knowing any facts. Why didn’t he use the taser instead? Why not run and grab the knife away from the girl if he wants to be a hero and save any injuries. Why shoot more than once as if she was a target at a firing range?

[Maximus]

What you are saying is that the girl in pink should have been allowed to get stabbed.

No, come on man.

I have a pretty good idea, that the girl in pink was no threat to the other girl at the time the police showed up.

It looked like it was her that called the police, as she was the first to go over when they arrived to greet them. She wasn't aggressive.

The police officers body cam shows that.

[Maximus]

like to see you run over there and pull the knife from her hand in time Kiks,

Only the flash can do that....

That girl was about to get stabbed by a hefty girl right in the stomach, heart....??

[Kikapu]

What you are saying is that the girl in pink should have been allowed to get stabbed.

No, come on man.

I have a pretty good idea, that the girl in pink was no threat to the other girl at the time the police showed up.

It looked like it was her that called the police, as she was the first to go over when they arrived to greet them. She wasn't aggressive.

The police officers body cam shows that.

So, the pink lady calls the cops and who knows how long the cops took to get there and during all this time before the cops arrive, the pink lady is still alive to greet the cops. So why didn’t the cops protect the pink lady from any harm by keeping others away? Is that because cops actually do not do that, but instead suddenly, the pink lady and the black lady are at each other again with a knife. What is the mental state of the black girl that she wants to harm the pink lady when the cops are there, but not harm her when the cops weren’t there? Really.

So why doesn’t the cop use the taser instead of the gun. What not fire a shot in the air to get everyone’s attention, or was it more important to get off 4 shots to see if they were all grouped together in her body as practiced at the firing range. The cop was too trigger happy from where I’m standing, which leads me to believe, he may be tried for this shooting after the city pays millions to the girls family for wrongful death by one of their officers.