This is not a situation where you can exibit bloody mindedness as the other side will only become more and more intrentched in their viewpoint and neither side will exibit the flexiblity to move forward, this is exactly what we see today, your line of thought appears to support this and will be the reason why we will never solve the Cyprus issue.
I will remind you again as you do not seem to tire of throwing your version of human rights and democracy in my face as it suits your aim which the more I read is to create a GC state with TC as just another minority. Well again I agree with you that as long as you maintain this mindset and do not acknowledge that we to desire the same ideals for all Cypriots and move on then why bother!!!
Yes, some mistakenly expected that Annan would base his proposal on the principles and resolutions of his own organization. I knew from the beginning that this was not the case since it was obvious to me than any non security council decision of the UN involving American interests was directly controlled by the Americans.
You were full aware of what was on the table in previous Annan plans which dont forget your leadership was ready to accept before Denktas walked out how can you now turn around and say that the plan did not incorporate UN resolutions , the plan was a compromise a road map to reaching level 10. The fact that you did not feel it was not in your favor is unfortunate because your leaders should have been negotiating in goodfaith and not producing the worse plan they could to guarantee people like you could manipulate the majority of GCs to vote no. It was clearly premedidated and the fact that TCs stood firm in New York caught your leaders on the wrong foot as they thought they could hide behind Denktas yet again and not have to reveal their true intentions, which is evident today than ever EU leverage over Turkey to extract GC demands.
So what if we rejected a proposal that we had 100% right to reject and which is now null and void? On the other hand Turkey showes complete disrespect to her obligations in respecting international low and the UN resolutions. If Turkey would follow the UN resolutions in the first place then no Annan plan would be needed.
I agree thats why we have a referendum and for the first time the people were asked we voted YES you voted NO end of story. What comes with that decision we all have to bear so trying to make feaible excuses doesnt really contribute to moving forward.
If Turkey were to follow UN resoluitons where would that leave the TC community? just where you want us I bet at the mercy of GCs human rights and democracy, with all due respect no thanks. Without definate rules and guidlines that only a compehensive solution can provide Turkey is here to stay.
For once more Turkey does the crimes and we are blamed for making the mistake of accepting Annan to fill in the blanks
Stop crying you made your bed so you have to lay in it which according to GCs warped viewpoint is better than ever in the international arena, so whats the problem?
Once more: If you share our aim that the solution should be one with no human rights violations and with democracy, then why should any of our leaders negotiate to get these things? Our leaders tried to get these things for 30 years, and then you blame us because you refused them?
Your leaders hid behind the Denktas stance and therefore milked the benefits of being the good guys for 30 years but all that changed and you are now having problems coping with it, from your posts I am still having difficulties accepting that your arguements are for the good of all Cypriots as they all lead to the same point a Greek Cypriot run state with TCs as just any othe minority. Why should I as a TC want that?? It will be a big step backwards for us and not desireable. No TC in the right mind would accept going backwards to live in a state run by GCs where we would be exposed to their interpretation of human rights and democracy. So you really have to think again no TCs will buy the fact that you chant human rights and democracy for all Cypriots if you do not exibit goodwill and measure to ensure that this would be the case in a united Cyprus.
The negotiations were done for 30 years with Turkey telling us "either you accept what we want or the illegal occupation continues". Yes, now we can say to Turkey "either you end your illegal occupation or we will use our 100% legal right to block you from EU". Any problem with that?
Unlike Turkey we are not doing anything illegal to force violations of human rights. We are doing something legal to try to force Turkey to accept human rights and democracy.
This is done by EU itself when it clearly tells to Turkey that in order to enter she needs to greatly improve her human rights record.
Piratis you are still having problems comprehending why you are unable to get rid of Turkey, the only way is to negotiate it or start a war and seeing you have been unable to do either for the last 30 years then that is as much your fault as it is theirs. The world cannot keep producing plans for GCs to reject and they will sooner or later realize if they havent done so already which is the feeling I get from the UN at the moment, that any plan that does not contain 100% GC demands will be rejected and this is just not possible. So that is why Tassos cannot restart UN negotiations and will make excuses until the cows come home as he very well knows that if this would be the last opportunity to unite Cyprus and many of the issues would not be as GCs want that they would again rejected it, this would mean the world would move towards recognizing the North.
As for GCs not doing anything illegal todayi Im sure you would also argue the same would go for the 1960s, which really sums up your mentality and reveals a great deal about you really view TCs and their role within Cypriot society.
As you know the Americans and the British tried to pass the Annan plan from the UN security council but this was rejected. Just this proves my point of whom within the UN was preparing the Annan plan, and we don't even need to see the fact that the Annan plan was one that met the desires of Turkey (a good US allie) at 90% and it didn't even respect our basic human rights.
Just proves how strong your Russian allies are, nothing more nothing less.
The occupation and the fact the illegality would be forced on us if we didn't accept a plan is not "gun on our head" kind of policy? Maybe when the Americans said that "a thousand brings will fall on your head if you do not accept the Annan plan" was also OK?
The Turkish army is a result of our mess and it is up to us to get rid of them, the only way to do this is to negotiate it, like we did in the Annan plan why is it so difficult to comprehend? Just shouting they are illegal and should leave does nto solve anything.
And when did GCs ever take any notice of what Americans said? for GCs Americans are the route to all evil, you are big and strong enough to oppose those guys why worry?
Papadopoulos was elected president easily for exactly this reason. Greek Cypriots would obviously not accept a plan that would violate their human and democratic rights. This is why the Annan plan was rejected, and this is why any plan will be rejected that will violate the human and democratic rights of people.
Its is your right to choose your leaders and take the route they lead you down but if you do not get the results you really desire then you have no one else but yourselves to blame. But Im pretty sure the GCs will blame all and sundry they have turned it into an art form.
This is why I said many times that any new plan should be negotiated in the framework of democracy and human rights. If your intention is another plan that would violate our human and democratic rights then it is not worth wasting our time negotiating.
I agree as long as those human rights and democracy are not administered by GCs.
Human rights and democracy and not "GC abiss" but universally accepted principles that you also have to finally accept some time.
But administered by GCs its a totally different ball game, you only have to look at the court case about the TCs that is unable to get electricity and the general standard of living of TCs in the south.
How about not repeating mistakes such as giving to foreigners intervention rights, giving to an 18% minority more than any other minority in the world has etc? What you say sounds nice, until one realizes that the "corrections" that you want are only the ones that suit you.
This is why instead of each side insisting on a tailored made solution by selectively using the past as an excuse, we should accept a system like any of the other EU democracies. (and US for the federation part)
How about not allowing the majority the right not to adhere to supreme court rulings? or acknowledge the veto? or respect human rights and democracy of all Cypriots? This can be argued both ways so we should ensure that the new system should be able to meet our situation, your are saying place the saddle of a full bred horse on a donkey Im sure we would all soon fall off. The saddle has to be tailored to fit the donkey so that we do not ever fall off again.
The EU laws talk about immigrants, not settlers that were brought by a state in violation of the Geneva convention. Of course it is sad that those people would have to pass from this due to the Turkish disrespect of any kind of international laws and agreements. This is why Turkey should improve in these things and stop violating the rights of her own citizens.
Please refrain from creating a negative climate asthis does not contribute to resolving anything the sooner you learn this the better it will be all.
How do you differentiate between the 2 these people came here out of their own free will just like the Turks did to Germany, and have now become citizens.
So you are saying that a man who has reisded in the north for 30 years should be thrown out. Well I dont agree, by all means lets find a way to rehouse thses people and return GC property but my view of human rights and democracy runs to not just whats written on paper but includes a conscience to do the right thing when I have the opportunity today and If you are unable to see this and act accordingly then all I can say is that this is a good example of GC administered human rights and democracy which we do not want any part of.