Londonrake wrote:Many reports of ISIL claiming responsibility for the Istanbul attack:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/01/i ... 08171.html
Thank you for sticking to the context of the OP and the thread.
I think it would be very logical to presuppose that ALL crimes like this from now on, will now be claimed by IS. They are a bit of a mystery as, unlike Al-Qaida there is no named leader of the organisation that we the observers can relate to. They need to keep their name in the spotlight ..... for the fear factor.
Going back to the OP; my own feelings are that it was not IS, they had nothing to do with it. Reason ....... think like your enemy! If you were going to all the trouble to enact such an attack, whilst 12 dead is 12 too many, thinking like a terrorist ...... would you not go for inflicting maximum casualties and an even higher number of deaths?
I think, and it's only my opinion, that IS would have packed the truck with explosives and would have been aware that the truck had an auto braking system. If they had done so the carnage would have been horrific.
I think he was just another deranged no brain Jihadist driven by a hate for the very people that gave him asylum in the first place, because he could not attain their quality of life and was never regarded (for good reason) as being one of them. His religious hang-ups and his general failure in life led him to take it out on others in revenge for his own failures!
Whatever, he deserved what he got .... he shot a policemen .... a policeman shot him and killed him. Justice was served, it's just a pity they could only kill him once!