Russia doesn't even have pilots trained to take off and land of its carrier.
The damn thing is a decoy.
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-bu ... -big-17756
Londonrake wrote:There were earlier reports that they practised night flying off the Orkneys.
Paphitis wrote:It will be a bit turbulent over the chimney stack though!
Wow, lots of fun, lots of fun and good times for the boys!
Jerry wrote:Paphitis wrote:It will be a bit turbulent over the chimney stack though!
Wow, lots of fun, lots of fun and good times for the boys!
Usually called a funnel on a ship by those who know what they are talking about.
Paphitis wrote:Londonrake wrote:There were earlier reports that they practised night flying off the Orkneys.
What kind of night flying?
I have no doubt they can launch a Helicopter, but the Coalition is gonna put these guys to the test just to see for themselves I have no doubt about it.
Londonrake wrote:Paphitis wrote:Londonrake wrote:There were earlier reports that they practised night flying off the Orkneys.
What kind of night flying?
I have no doubt they can launch a Helicopter, but the Coalition is gonna put these guys to the test just to see for themselves I have no doubt about it.
Dunno. I can't search too well at present. Banana fingers I'm sure there was something in the press about it though.
TBH it doesn't seem to make much sense, apart from a "show of strength". Russia has access to airfields in Syria. Much easier to operate aircraft from those. Why send a fleet thousands of miles from home? A bit technically risky I would have thought.
Back in the bad old days there was a Soviet "rescue" tug permanently stationed off the Shetlands. They also kept an AGI off the Malin Head and there was an amphibious assault ship anchored well to the south of Cyprus. If a ship or sub gets into trouble they have a real problem. It's a long way from home.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests