GreekIslandGirl wrote:Any reasonable person would want to take shared responsibility when so much is at stake from so few. I would accept that vote and cherish it.
If the person heading the World Superpower can't even email securely or deems pay-and-play part of the daily routine, surely the rest of us should get a say as to who is least likely to carelessly press that button?
- I'm coming round to thinking Trump loves Life too much and Clinton loves Power too much and if that is the case ...
I wouldn't worry about the email scandal. To prove criminality you need to prove willful security breaches which isn't the case.
Worse case scenario is the State Apparatus will clamp down on her security and ensure she understands the repercussions.
Whilst she could have divulged classified information, I doubt she could have done a lot of damage.
In addition, if its such an issue, they should be prohibited from talking on their mobile phones because that is the most insecure of all and as far as I know, even the President uses a Motorola phone.
Fact of the matter is, there is absolutely nothing that is 100% secure 100% of the time. Not even Government websites and servers. Governments spend a lot of money attacking foreign agencies, cracking their servers and stealing information.
Just a couple of years ago, America was caught listening to Merkel's phone calls, SMS and email and at the same time Australia was caught doing the same thing to the Indonesians and Chinese. Caused major incidents where Ambassadors were recalled.