miltiades wrote:I think every one knows that Syria has been ruled for decades by one family. Also, every one knows that just like other ME countries Syria was also ruled not according to western type of democracy but a " democratic" dictatorship .
Let the ME sort out their differences be it religious differences or ideological.
We have seen the chaos created in Iraq following the removal of Saddam, a ruthless dictator but not that different from all other dictators ruling the ME.
Saudi Arabia, in my opinion, is probably the most dictatorial intolerant regime in the world. Why does the west tolerate and go to bed with such a regime ?
but I thought Syria was a democracy! that is what you have been saying. that is what robin hood has been saying.
I am so disappointed now, knowing that all your posts were rubbish. What am I going to do now?
Fact is, the West don't want to be running these countries and maintain security from an imposed by us democratic System. The main issue at the heart of discontent is not allowing people to live in dignity for whatever reason. the population could be ruthlessly oppressed by a Dictator and have their HR violated, or the country could have a sectarian divide (like Syria and Iraq) where the other sect live in squalor, can't send their kids to school, no employment opportunities and generally just having a bad existence.
The west is more than happy to tolerate many Dictatorships. What is the West or the UN finds difficult to accept are gross violations of HR, oppression, summary killings, incarcerations, the use of chemical and biological weapons and so on.
The fact that some Dictators do this, IS the reason why there is war, and rebel and terrorist groups. no one in their right mind just wakes up and decides that the AK47 is their best companion.