Paphitis wrote:It's not preliminary at all.
They are the final deliberations of the Crash Investigation Team. They have attributed the crash to be the result of MH17 being shot down from a BUK Missile fired from Russian controlled territory and even have solid evidence in the form of communications, the actual launcher as it withdrew back into Russia itself. It's 100% conclusive.
It is the result of the investigation and is a preliminary step in the process, even the media acknowledge that. As I said to you; it is the equivalent of the
'case for the prosecution', we still need to hear the defence ..... which of course you will label as Russian propaganda.
It was not Russian controlled territory it was '
supposedly' a rebel held area of Ukraine!
".......
the actual launcher as it withdrew back into Russia itself. It's 100% conclusive." Er, no! That is based on information gleaned from the Internet and social media and assembled by Bellingcat to suit the desired conclusion and has many flaws and omissions, much of this has already been debunked. It is as
'100%' as their conclusion on the Aid Convoy attack!
I showed you how unreliable Bellingcat are from the
'Aid Convoy' thread, if I can find the holes then someone who was an expert would be able to destroy the argument completely. You only decry '
YouTube' when it says something you disagree with ..... if YouTube is used by Bellingcat it's fine!